From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH pata-2.6 fix queue] aec62xx: kill speedproc() method wrapper Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:20:00 +0400 Message-ID: <464B1310.2080808@ru.mvista.com> References: <200702032309.43867.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200702162321.40813.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200705120122.34384.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200705152343.12956.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:16495 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754604AbXEPOS1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 10:18:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200705152343.12956.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>There's no reason to have the speedproc() method wrapper for the two quite >>different chip families, so just get rid of it. >>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > applied I forgot to notice/mention the side effect: there would be no speedproc() method installed if hwif->dma_base happens to be 0. MBR, Sergei