Re: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2021-08-17

From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	buildroot@buildroot.org,
	 Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>,
	Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>,
	Adam Duskett <aduskett@gmail.com>,
	Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>,
	Bernd Kuhls <bernd.kuhls@t-online.de>,
	Gwenhael Goavec-Merou <gwenhael.goavec-merou@trabucayre.com>,
	Eric Le Bihan <eric.le.bihan.dev@free.fr>
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2021-08-17
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:27:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4660a41d-6111-05aa-4b82-274391cd7bd9@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210818234453.03d2237a@windsurf>

On 18/08/2021 23:44, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
[snip]
>>    xtensa    |       host-cairo-1.16.0        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/00096bad2d9eee90c07761fc8c7f9eafe8782dac |     
>>   mips64el   |       host-cairo-1.16.0        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/c1d61387edf1f79522f7d9df82c90c9cd67bba2d |     
> 
> cannot delete non-empty directory: share/gettext
> could not make way for new symlink: share/gettext
> 
> Seems like a per-package issue. Hm, I think Fabrice you looked into
> this. Hervé, any input?

 Fixed by 93351fa0b3b8b6dd10faa9a15a7a173b92cb40a0. It's not obvious since the
fix is actually in fontconfig, not cairo.

[snip]
>>    mipsel    |         openmpi-4.0.0          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/2f96654c2238c115060aafc3cf10f71457c585f7 | ORPH
> 
> checking alignment of Fortran type(test_mpi_handle)... configure: error: Can not determine alignment of type(test_mpi_handle) when cross-compiling
> 
> Gwenhael, Arnout, you are the folks who looked at Fortran stuff :-)

 Hehe. It's not really fortran stuff, it's just cross-compilation. Probably
needs an ac_cv setting, possibly a patch to enable it.

[snip]
>>   riscv32    |         qt5base-5.15.2         | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/568f7fceebb06deb0755e8d3757c761608faeec7 |     
> 
> thread/qfutex_p.h:116:30: error: '__NR_futex' was not declared in this scope; did you mean '_q_futex'?
>   116 |         int result = syscall(__NR_futex, addr, op | FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG, val, val2, addr2, val3);
>       |                              ^~~~~~~~~~
>       |                              _q_futex
> 
> Need to explore why __NR_futex is not available on RISC-V 32-bit and
> what we're supposed to use instead.

 __NR_futex64, but it's not as simple as that because you also need to make sure
64-bit time_t is used as an argument.

 Regards,
 Arnout

[snip]
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot