From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH pata-2.6] aec62xx: kill speedproc() method wrapper (take 2) Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 14:05:00 +0400 Message-ID: <466A7B4C.2010509@ru.mvista.com> References: <200702032309.43867.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200705282244.54862.bzolnier@gmail.com> <46657E21.8090804@ru.mvista.com> <200706081422.10662.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:7271 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750808AbXFIKDO (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2007 06:03:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200706081422.10662.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>>>There's no reason to have the speedproc() method wrapper for the two quite >>>>different chip families, so just get rid of it. >>>>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov >>>>--- >>>>Tthis version of the patch properly installs the speedproc() method. >>>>Again, the patch has only been compile tested... >>>applied after fixing the following trivial reject (not a problem >>>but I thought I would let you know in case I missed something): >> Yes, you did. I've also recast the patch killing init_dma() method. Do I >>need to resend it? > Please do. Just have resent it privately. MBR, Sergei