From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756046AbXFKTi0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:38:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752806AbXFKTiS (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:38:18 -0400 Received: from smtpa1.netcabo.pt ([212.113.174.16]:19191 "EHLO exch01smtp03.hdi.tvcabo" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752480AbXFKTiR (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:38:17 -0400 Message-ID: <466DA42A.6010600@rncbc.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:36:10 +0100 From: Rui Nuno Capela User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gleixner CC: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles References: <23932.213.58.131.130.1170156409.squirrel@www.rncbc.org> <460FE7F3.4060303@rncbc.org> <20070401183928.GB27614@elte.hu> <46574DE4.2080900@rncbc.org> <1180195709.4264.7.camel@chaos> <4658A4F4.1080204@rncbc.org> <46660369.2070104@rncbc.org> <1181317625.4404.332.camel@chaos> <59605.213.13.107.141.1181326897.squirrel@www.rncbc.org> <1181328636.4404.335.camel@chaos> In-Reply-To: <1181328636.4404.335.camel@chaos> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2007 19:38:13.0529 (UTC) FILETIME=[0CD23890:01C7AC60] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 19:21 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: >> Just built from linux-2.6.22-rc4.tar.bz2, with patch-2.6.22-rc4-hrt5. >> All's working apparentely nice on this offending machine (laptop, intel >> core2 T7200). In fact, I'm writing this very reply under it and through >> ipw3945 wifi module--which never was so pragmatic on -rt2..9 ;) >> >> Nevertheless, this is not preempt-realtime (-rt) is it? And I it never >> complained about vanilla. >> >> Is this good news though? > > Well, the patch carries the same high resolution timer fixes as -rt, so > I just wanted to exclude those. Thanks for testing. > > I'm spinning -rt10 with a couple of fixes. Should be out sometimes > tomorrow. If the problem persists, we need to dig deeper. > Uhoh. I'm sorry to tell, but the problem is still creeping on 2.6.21.4-rt11 and -rt12 :( So sorry. -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rncbc@rncbc.org