From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755008AbcKOPOc (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:14:32 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:34923 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751088AbcKOPOa (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:14:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v1) To: Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim References: <20161114161243.15403-1-namhyung@kernel.org> <20161115064214.GB27089@gmail.com> <20161115065509.GB16821@danjae.aot.lge.com> <20161115073413.GA7016@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Olsa , LKML , Stephane Eranian , Andi Kleen From: David Ahern Message-ID: <468ed743-a7e9-44e4-6fcc-5853ab49447e@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:14:24 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161115073413.GA7016@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/15/16 12:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Namhyung Kim wrote: > >>>> By default it shows the individual schedule events, including the time between >>>> sched-in events for the task, the task scheduling delay (time between wakeup >>>> and actually running) and run time for the task: >>>> >>>> time cpu task name[tid/pid] b/n time sch delay run time >>>> ------------- ---- -------------------- --------- --------- --------- >>>> 79371.874569 [11] gcc[31949] 0.014 0.000 1.148 >>>> 79371.874591 [10] gcc[31951] 0.000 0.000 0.024 >>>> 79371.874603 [10] migration/10[59] 3.350 0.004 0.011 >>>> 79371.874604 [11] 1.148 0.000 0.035 >>>> 79371.874723 [05] 0.016 0.000 1.383 >>>> 79371.874746 [05] gcc[31949] 0.153 0.078 0.022 >>>> ... >>> >>> What does the 'b/n' abbreviation stand for? 'Between'? Could we call the column >>> 'sch wait' instead, or so? >> >> Looks better, or what about 'wait time'? > > Works for me! That column generically is time not running -- time between the last sched out and the current sched in. It could be expected (sleep, select, read, ...), waiting for a resource (disk I/O, mutex) or preemption. > >> I'd go with the first option - simply adding arrows. It's good enough to >> identify each function IMHO. > > Ok! I'd prefer the arrows too for a default. Color can be an add-on option.