From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Netfilter List cross-subscription [Re: Test] Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:21:34 +0200 Message-ID: <46EFB4BE.9010307@trash.net> References: <46EE6679.3000103@trash.net> <46EE6956.10608@trash.net> <20070917153015.GJ18480@postel.suug.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Core Team , Netfilter Development Mailinglist To: Thomas Graf Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:34354 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbXIRL2I (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:28:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070917153015.GJ18480@postel.suug.ch> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Thomas Graf wrote: > * Patrick McHardy 2007-09-17 13:47 > >>Patrick McHardy wrote: >> >>>netfilter-devel cross-subscription test, please ignore >> >> >>The cross-subscription appears to work, unfortunately (due to the >>subscriber-only posting settings of the old list) senders to the >>new lists that are not subscribed to the old one will receive a >>"held for moderator approval" mail for each post. Since this is >>probably quite annoying for everyone, I'm not sure whether we >>should really do the cross-subscription thing. > > > What about just disabling the subscriber-only setting on the old > list for the time being?? It's going to disappear anyways, no? That might motivate people to use the new list :) But I think all this effort is pretty useless, people should just subscribe to the new list.