From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/19] bcache: initialize stripe_sectors_dirty correctly for thin flash device To: Tang Junhui Cc: bcache@lists.ewheeler.net, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20170629134510.GA32385@infradead.org> <1498855388-16990-1-git-send-email-bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> <1498855388-16990-10-git-send-email-bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> From: Coly Li Message-ID: <46e7b8b2-7fac-6404-a6fc-696bfb1e0c61@coly.li> Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 02:52:14 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1498855388-16990-10-git-send-email-bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: On 2017/7/1 上午4:42, bcache@lists.ewheeler.net wrote: > From: Tang Junhui > > Thin flash device does not initialize stripe_sectors_dirty correctly, this > patch fixes this issue. Hi Junhui, Could you please explain why stripe_sectors_ditry is not correctly initialized and how about its negative result ? Thanks. Coly > > Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 3 ++- > drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c > index 1f84791..e06641e 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c > @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ int bch_cached_dev_attach(struct cached_dev *dc, struct cache_set *c) > } > > if (BDEV_STATE(&dc->sb) == BDEV_STATE_DIRTY) { > - bch_sectors_dirty_init(dc); > + bch_sectors_dirty_init(&dc->disk); > atomic_set(&dc->has_dirty, 1); > atomic_inc(&dc->count); > bch_writeback_queue(dc); > @@ -1232,6 +1232,7 @@ static int flash_dev_run(struct cache_set *c, struct uuid_entry *u) > goto err; > > bcache_device_attach(d, c, u - c->uuids); > + bch_sectors_dirty_init(d); > bch_flash_dev_request_init(d); > add_disk(d->disk); > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c > index 3d463f0..4ac8b13 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c > @@ -482,17 +482,17 @@ static int sectors_dirty_init_fn(struct btree_op *_op, struct btree *b, > return MAP_CONTINUE; > } > > -void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct cached_dev *dc) > +void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct bcache_device *d) > { > struct sectors_dirty_init op; > > bch_btree_op_init(&op.op, -1); > - op.inode = dc->disk.id; > + op.inode = d->id; > > - bch_btree_map_keys(&op.op, dc->disk.c, &KEY(op.inode, 0, 0), > + bch_btree_map_keys(&op.op, d->c, &KEY(op.inode, 0, 0), > sectors_dirty_init_fn, 0); > > - dc->disk.sectors_dirty_last = bcache_dev_sectors_dirty(&dc->disk); > + d->sectors_dirty_last = bcache_dev_sectors_dirty(d); > } > > void bch_cached_dev_writeback_init(struct cached_dev *dc) > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h > index ea2f92e..c2ab4b4 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h > @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static inline void bch_writeback_add(struct cached_dev *dc) > > void bcache_dev_sectors_dirty_add(struct cache_set *, unsigned, uint64_t, int); > > -void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct cached_dev *dc); > +void bch_sectors_dirty_init(struct bcache_device *); > void bch_cached_dev_writeback_init(struct cached_dev *); > int bch_cached_dev_writeback_start(struct cached_dev *);