From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20170808112357.0063d74d@md1em3qc> <20170808134801.59ae5de6@md1em3qc> <86562178-3b5a-55fc-8652-dc15f228e541@xenomai.org> <20170808212758.550caab0@md1em3qc> <20170825191604.723abf24@md1em3qc> <553cc0c2-2ce4-5182-b6eb-4a18ccad82b5@xenomai.org> <20170829142726.23ea20ef@md1em3qc> <445755f9-7406-98e9-7e2f-e30b4a6237b2@xenomai.org> <20170829192018.19f2ede9@md1em3qc> From: Philippe Gerum Message-ID: <46f175d1-0b72-9b94-2543-161bbbdb401f@xenomai.org> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 22:02:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170829192018.19f2ede9@md1em3qc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] Xenomai3 tuneables replaced by environment variables List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Henning Schild Cc: "KISZKA, JAN" , xenomai@xenomai.org On 08/29/2017 07:20 PM, Henning Schild wrote: > I do not mind changing the customers software to address the issue > there. The whole thread was about making xenomai simpler, inspired by > having to look deeper into the settings/tuneables. > The fact that we had to talk about it for so long could indicate that > the whole thing is not so simple. > Don't you want to get a stab at the proposal to turn all Xenomai parameters found in setup descriptors to potential/possible environment variables? I believe that this would fit your bill, without causing any regression to other existing applications that may already depend on the tuning mechanism. That seems to be a fair deal to me. -- Philippe.