From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0967C47082 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF6F61042 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:47:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4DF6F61042 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:47464 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqd0N-0002NB-Hl for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 10:46:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqczI-0001Ju-6G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 10:45:53 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:21703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqczF-0004Zl-MT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 10:45:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623163549; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0bZrE+OSi9x7BhqGIg9fwu44BYqgDsQKTFFG1rxVLQM=; b=ZXiyxBlIfj+iZ/A3mwuFcrYrY2vt2JKofRUlQQgjdSvPJg9tZWWuUFInMxDv0OA7bZyEve Qbi3QZUJw1G6Jnd7owpJPVNO42150Pa+Z6+iNDly/4lgjc4403RxUQebC1dkWjugnibKFH 6SxEGl8wv3jgyA21UuOIf0Fc2O5pamQ= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-421-Fmjek2pKPQiB_dkNNOLnDQ-1; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 10:45:47 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Fmjek2pKPQiB_dkNNOLnDQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id u5-20020adf9e050000b029010df603f280so9539718wre.18 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 07:45:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0bZrE+OSi9x7BhqGIg9fwu44BYqgDsQKTFFG1rxVLQM=; b=j2fRJ6IiKZ6WvdpRU8xjEAhfIpNz/aBWtwZty8mAsZ9L/ZBVexQm1My7AQslDyOt47 Vrlci6CUXdl2p0CnCv0N7xAGgwsraXtbBdOXJicoO+HaOF7PkEXmSR9x34IJ2O3+FygP vbkgqochYVYJuLP3SQ+MXhBHtWRl+HTTqa0kw7ktPAd4ch99K7S3iX/7K+9FousFi8eU miazakMgL6FYWDOrjWt1y8fbeO4n5LOTh7fYOGeD85U6EUBIRNhKFfVhhGt9W7SyDS4b 8vjwBoMyeUD3kgg06EV+8tdXHBdwPdUTCNUA4DFEhHRzK0T5SbwIO4ZUnfWAdPubwg+i pHiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ctnMUIka13PgptC6peOpFsUr3BQhL5iWxdQdxSW/lvItK0mk0 vumf+b5T/+dNgi8dF4FwawPG48wpeHecVR5myoMJE0+h3zAbJ3O/dpEAPFZ8b1U3iRaOYMi1FlW 35AGm4dXUxDgPBb0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1847:: with SMTP id c7mr23339956wri.368.1623163546573; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 07:45:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyMfsVEl/d1XhVdvMNZhfMAff/c0zINoVwjs5UaYhkZztzJxxUH6EXEm3u5wAnxThrm4Y+EA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1847:: with SMTP id c7mr23339940wri.368.1623163546454; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 07:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (pd9e83d80.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.232.61.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m21sm3058601wms.42.2021.06.08.07.45.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Jun 2021 07:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 96/99] tests/qtest: split the cdrom-test into arm/aarch64 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= References: <20210604155312.15902-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <20210604155312.15902-97-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <83b32ad3-18a6-c9d4-6561-c3c880234e09@redhat.com> <8f6c0b14-16da-4699-a279-fcbacd1e862d@redhat.com> <87fsxsl8o8.fsf@linaro.org> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <471ef045-3097-97de-0629-cce8f4cab235@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:45:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87fsxsl8o8.fsf@linaro.org> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.197, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Laurent Vivier , "open list:IDE" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , John Snow Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 08/06/2021 16.41, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Thomas Huth writes: > >> On 08/06/2021 15.42, John Snow wrote: >>> On 6/4/21 11:53 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>> The assumption that the qemu-system-aarch64 image can run all 32 bit >>>> machines is about to be broken and besides it's not likely this is >>> What's changing? I'm not deeply familiar with aarch64. Why is this >>> assumption about to be broken? >> >> That's also quite a surprise to me. Do you have any pointers? > > It's at the top of the series. If you build qemu-system-aarch64 with a > custom config you won't be able to instantiate those machines. Ideally > it would probe and maybe fail safe if the binary doesn't support the > model. Is that possible in qtest? Not yet. You'd need to do something similar like Philippe did in patch 03/99, but instead of running query-accel, you have to run query-machines instead. Thomas