From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: Re: Next steps with pv_ops for Xen Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:14:04 +0000 Message-ID: <474C5E6C.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> References: <1195682725.6726.48.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> <4744BB54.4040803@goop.org> <474B15FC.4050901@goop.org> <474BE3D1.76E4.0078.0@novell.com><474BE3D1.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <474C4D1D.9020700@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <474C4D1D.9020700@goop.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Eduardo Habkost , Juan Quintela , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Glauber de Oliveira Costa , Chris Wright , "virtualization@lists.osdl.org" , Juan Quintela List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org >The oops and backtrace doesn't suggest it's an MSR write. Does a crX Oh, right, the MSR write is being ignored, not failed. >write take the same path through the emulator as an MSR write? No, the two operations take different paths. Jan