From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set OLD_ICONV on Cygwin. Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:43:23 +0100 Message-ID: <4755597B.9050709@op5.se> References: <21977191.137171196775591804.JavaMail.www@wwinf1621> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pascal Obry , Pascal Obry , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Pascal Obry X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 04 14:43:56 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IzY44-0002LG-46 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:43:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752527AbXLDNnf (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:43:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752728AbXLDNnf (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:43:35 -0500 Received: from mail.op5.se ([193.201.96.20]:54902 "EHLO mail.op5.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752346AbXLDNne (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:43:34 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9B71F08052; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:43:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.op5.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.op5.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vc1xoh5S37Ye; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:43:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from nox.op5.se (unknown [192.168.1.20]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492E31F08004; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:43:27 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) In-Reply-To: <21977191.137171196775591804.JavaMail.www@wwinf1621> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pascal Obry wrote: > Andreas Ericsson wrote: >> Only one, insofar as I can see; You didn't CC Junio. He probably missed it. > > Hum, I don't think this is a requirement. At least nothing is said about > CCing Junio on the Git Web site. > It's not a requirement, but he won't act on things he doesn't see, and CC'ing him directly is the recommended way of getting his attention. Most people do so for patches that aren't directly related to a sub-part of git primarily maintained by someone else (Shawn O. Pearce for git-gui, Eric Wong for git-svn, etc., etc.) > Anyway, now Junio is CCed :) > Nice. If my suspicions are correct and he missed your patch the first time around, you should probably resend it though. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231