From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+list@rabbit.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use new sb type
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:47:10 +0100
Message-ID: <479E232E.1030801@rabbit.us>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801281818430.1185@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> <479E1C95.1040008@dgreaves.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <479E1C95.1040008@dgreaves.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

David Greaves wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> This makes 1.0 the default sb type for new arrays.
>>
> 
> IIRC there was a discussion a while back on renaming mdadm options (google "Time
> to  deprecate old RAID formats?") and the superblocks to emphasise the location
> and data structure. Would it be good to introduce the new names at the same time
> as changing the default format/on-disk-location?
> 
> David

Also wasn't the concession to make 1.1 default instead of 1.0 ?

Peter