* [PATCH 0/3] bmc150-accel fixes and cleanup
@ 2015-06-15 21:48 Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: fix counting direction Hartmut Knaack
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hartmut Knaack @ 2015-06-15 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-iio
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Octavian Purdila, Laurentiu Palcu
This series adresses some issues that got introduced this year, as well as
some that checkpatch.pl pointed out.
Hartmut Knaack (3):
iio:accel:bmc150-accel: fix counting direction
iio:accel:bmc150-accel: make use of mask definition
iio:accel:bmc150-accel: code style cleanup
drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
--
2.3.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: fix counting direction
2015-06-15 21:48 [PATCH 0/3] bmc150-accel fixes and cleanup Hartmut Knaack
@ 2015-06-15 21:48 ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-16 10:31 ` Octavian Purdila
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: make use of mask definition Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: code style cleanup Hartmut Knaack
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hartmut Knaack @ 2015-06-15 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-iio
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Octavian Purdila, Laurentiu Palcu
In bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers() triggers should be unregistered in
reverse order of registration. Trigger registration starts with number 0,
counting up. In consequence, trigger number needs to be count down here.
Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
---
drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
index 4e70f51..cc5a357 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
@@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static void bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
{
int i;
- for (i = from; i >= 0; i++) {
+ for (i = from; i >= 0; i--) {
if (data->triggers[i].indio_trig) {
iio_trigger_unregister(data->triggers[i].indio_trig);
data->triggers[i].indio_trig = NULL;
--
2.3.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: make use of mask definition
2015-06-15 21:48 [PATCH 0/3] bmc150-accel fixes and cleanup Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: fix counting direction Hartmut Knaack
@ 2015-06-15 21:48 ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-16 10:34 ` Octavian Purdila
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: code style cleanup Hartmut Knaack
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hartmut Knaack @ 2015-06-15 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-iio
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Octavian Purdila, Laurentiu Palcu
BMC150_ACCEL_SLOPE_THRES_MASK was defined some time ago, but its 'magic'
value got used instead in bmc150_accel_write_event(). Make use of it for
improved readability.
Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
---
drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
index cc5a357..36a9cd5 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_write_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
switch (info) {
case IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE:
- data->slope_thres = val & 0xFF;
+ data->slope_thres = val & BMC150_ACCEL_SLOPE_THRES_MASK;
break;
case IIO_EV_INFO_PERIOD:
data->slope_dur = val & BMC150_ACCEL_SLOPE_DUR_MASK;
--
2.3.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: code style cleanup
2015-06-15 21:48 [PATCH 0/3] bmc150-accel fixes and cleanup Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: fix counting direction Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: make use of mask definition Hartmut Knaack
@ 2015-06-15 21:48 ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-16 10:33 ` Octavian Purdila
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Hartmut Knaack @ 2015-06-15 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-iio
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Octavian Purdila, Laurentiu Palcu
Apply the following coding style changes as indicated by checkpatch.pl in
strict mode:
- Please don't use multiple blank lines
- braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement (if/else)
- Alignment should match open parenthesis
- Please don't use multiple blank lines
- Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
- Missing a blank line after declarations
- No space is necessary after a cast
Also wrap/consolidate error messages to fit 80 characters per line and
rework a comment.
Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
---
drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
index 36a9cd5..e84e2a1 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
@@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ static const struct {
{500000, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_500_MS},
{1000000, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_1_SEC} };
-
static int bmc150_accel_set_mode(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
enum bmc150_power_modes mode,
int dur_us)
@@ -259,8 +258,9 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_mode(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
dur_val =
bmc150_accel_sleep_value_table[i].reg_value;
}
- } else
+ } else {
dur_val = 0;
+ }
if (dur_val < 0)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_bw(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int val,
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table); ++i) {
if (bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val == val &&
- bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val2 == val2) {
+ bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val2 == val2) {
ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(
data->client,
BMC150_ACCEL_REG_PMU_BW,
@@ -351,8 +351,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, BMC150_ACCEL_REG_CHIP_ID);
if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(&data->client->dev,
- "Error: Reading chip id\n");
+ dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error: Reading chip id\n");
return ret;
}
@@ -376,8 +375,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
BMC150_ACCEL_REG_PMU_RANGE,
BMC150_ACCEL_DEF_RANGE_4G);
if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(&data->client->dev,
- "Error writing reg_pmu_range\n");
+ dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_pmu_range\n");
return ret;
}
@@ -437,12 +435,13 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_power_state(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, bool on)
{
int ret;
- if (on)
+ if (on) {
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&data->client->dev);
- else {
+ } else {
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&data->client->dev);
ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&data->client->dev);
}
+
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&data->client->dev,
"Failed: bmc150_accel_set_power_state for %d\n", on);
@@ -514,13 +513,13 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int i,
}
/*
- * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
- * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
- * resume operation uses sync mode runtime pm calls, the
- * suspend operation will be delayed by autosuspend delay
- * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse of
- * enable operation. When runtime pm is disabled the mode
- * is always on so sequence doesn't matter
+ * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in reverse
+ * order. This will happen here anyway, as our resume operation uses
+ * sync mode runtime pm calls. The suspend operation will be delayed
+ * by autosuspend delay.
+ * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse order of
+ * enable operation. When runtime pm is disabled the mode is always on,
+ * so sequence doesn't matter.
*/
ret = bmc150_accel_set_power_state(data, state);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -574,7 +573,6 @@ out_fix_power_state:
return ret;
}
-
static int bmc150_accel_set_scale(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int val)
{
int ret, i;
@@ -674,8 +672,9 @@ static int bmc150_accel_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP) {
*val = BMC150_ACCEL_TEMP_CENTER_VAL;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
- } else
+ } else {
return -EINVAL;
+ }
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
*val = 0;
switch (chan->type) {
@@ -793,7 +792,6 @@ static int bmc150_accel_read_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
enum iio_event_type type,
enum iio_event_direction dir)
{
-
struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
return data->ev_enable_state;
@@ -827,7 +825,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
}
static int bmc150_accel_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
- struct iio_trigger *trig)
+ struct iio_trigger *trig)
{
struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
int i;
@@ -963,6 +961,7 @@ static int __bmc150_accel_fifo_flush(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
u16 buffer[BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH * 3];
int64_t tstamp;
uint64_t sample_period;
+
ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
BMC150_ACCEL_REG_FIFO_STATUS);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -1255,7 +1254,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_trig_try_reen(struct iio_trigger *trig)
}
static int bmc150_accel_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
- bool state)
+ bool state)
{
struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
struct bmc150_accel_data *data = t->data;
@@ -1314,26 +1313,32 @@ static int bmc150_accel_handle_roc_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
dir = IIO_EV_DIR_RISING;
if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_X)
- iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
- 0,
- IIO_MOD_X,
- IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
- dir),
- data->timestamp);
+ iio_push_event(indio_dev,
+ IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
+ 0,
+ IIO_MOD_X,
+ IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
+ dir),
+ data->timestamp);
+
if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_Y)
- iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
- 0,
- IIO_MOD_Y,
- IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
- dir),
- data->timestamp);
+ iio_push_event(indio_dev,
+ IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
+ 0,
+ IIO_MOD_Y,
+ IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
+ dir),
+ data->timestamp);
+
if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_Z)
- iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
- 0,
- IIO_MOD_Z,
- IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
- dir),
- data->timestamp);
+ iio_push_event(indio_dev,
+ IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
+ 0,
+ IIO_MOD_Z,
+ IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
+ dir),
+ data->timestamp);
+
return ret;
}
@@ -1365,7 +1370,9 @@ static irqreturn_t bmc150_accel_irq_thread_handler(int irq, void *private)
BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MODE_LATCH_INT |
BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MODE_LATCH_RESET);
if (ret)
- dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_int_rst_latch\n");
+ dev_err(&data->client->dev,
+ "Error writing reg_int_rst_latch\n");
+
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
} else {
ret = IRQ_NONE;
@@ -1412,13 +1419,13 @@ static const char *bmc150_accel_match_acpi_device(struct device *dev, int *data)
if (!id)
return NULL;
- *data = (int) id->driver_data;
+ *data = (int)id->driver_data;
return dev_name(dev);
}
static int bmc150_accel_gpio_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
- struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
+ struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
{
struct device *dev;
struct gpio_desc *gpio;
--
2.3.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: fix counting direction
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: fix counting direction Hartmut Knaack
@ 2015-06-16 10:31 ` Octavian Purdila
2015-06-21 13:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Purdila @ 2015-06-16 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hartmut Knaack
Cc: linux-iio, Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Laurentiu Palcu
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> In bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers() triggers should be unregistered in
> reverse order of registration. Trigger registration starts with number 0,
> counting up. In consequence, trigger number needs to be count down here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> index 4e70f51..cc5a357 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static void bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = from; i >= 0; i++) {
> + for (i = from; i >= 0; i--) {
> if (data->triggers[i].indio_trig) {
> iio_trigger_unregister(data->triggers[i].indio_trig);
> data->triggers[i].indio_trig = NULL;
> --
> 2.3.6
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: code style cleanup
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: code style cleanup Hartmut Knaack
@ 2015-06-16 10:33 ` Octavian Purdila
2015-06-21 13:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Purdila @ 2015-06-16 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hartmut Knaack
Cc: linux-iio, Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Laurentiu Palcu
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de> wrote:
> Apply the following coding style changes as indicated by checkpatch.pl in
> strict mode:
> - Please don't use multiple blank lines
> - braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement (if/else)
> - Alignment should match open parenthesis
> - Please don't use multiple blank lines
> - Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
> - Missing a blank line after declarations
> - No space is necessary after a cast
>
> Also wrap/consolidate error messages to fit 80 characters per line and
> rework a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> index 36a9cd5..e84e2a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> @@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ static const struct {
> {500000, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_500_MS},
> {1000000, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_1_SEC} };
>
> -
> static int bmc150_accel_set_mode(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
> enum bmc150_power_modes mode,
> int dur_us)
> @@ -259,8 +258,9 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_mode(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
> dur_val =
> bmc150_accel_sleep_value_table[i].reg_value;
> }
> - } else
> + } else {
> dur_val = 0;
> + }
>
> if (dur_val < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_bw(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int val,
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table); ++i) {
> if (bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val == val &&
> - bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val2 == val2) {
> + bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val2 == val2) {
> ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(
> data->client,
> BMC150_ACCEL_REG_PMU_BW,
> @@ -351,8 +351,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>
> ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, BMC150_ACCEL_REG_CHIP_ID);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(&data->client->dev,
> - "Error: Reading chip id\n");
> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error: Reading chip id\n");
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -376,8 +375,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
> BMC150_ACCEL_REG_PMU_RANGE,
> BMC150_ACCEL_DEF_RANGE_4G);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(&data->client->dev,
> - "Error writing reg_pmu_range\n");
> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_pmu_range\n");
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -437,12 +435,13 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_power_state(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, bool on)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (on)
> + if (on) {
> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&data->client->dev);
> - else {
> + } else {
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&data->client->dev);
> ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&data->client->dev);
> }
> +
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&data->client->dev,
> "Failed: bmc150_accel_set_power_state for %d\n", on);
> @@ -514,13 +513,13 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int i,
> }
>
> /*
> - * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
> - * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
> - * resume operation uses sync mode runtime pm calls, the
> - * suspend operation will be delayed by autosuspend delay
> - * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse of
> - * enable operation. When runtime pm is disabled the mode
> - * is always on so sequence doesn't matter
> + * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in reverse
> + * order. This will happen here anyway, as our resume operation uses
> + * sync mode runtime pm calls. The suspend operation will be delayed
> + * by autosuspend delay.
> + * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse order of
> + * enable operation. When runtime pm is disabled the mode is always on,
> + * so sequence doesn't matter.
> */
> ret = bmc150_accel_set_power_state(data, state);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -574,7 +573,6 @@ out_fix_power_state:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -
> static int bmc150_accel_set_scale(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int val)
> {
> int ret, i;
> @@ -674,8 +672,9 @@ static int bmc150_accel_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP) {
> *val = BMC150_ACCEL_TEMP_CENTER_VAL;
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> - } else
> + } else {
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> *val = 0;
> switch (chan->type) {
> @@ -793,7 +792,6 @@ static int bmc150_accel_read_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> enum iio_event_type type,
> enum iio_event_direction dir)
> {
> -
> struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>
> return data->ev_enable_state;
> @@ -827,7 +825,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> }
>
> static int bmc150_accel_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> - struct iio_trigger *trig)
> + struct iio_trigger *trig)
> {
> struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> int i;
> @@ -963,6 +961,7 @@ static int __bmc150_accel_fifo_flush(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> u16 buffer[BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH * 3];
> int64_t tstamp;
> uint64_t sample_period;
> +
> ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
> BMC150_ACCEL_REG_FIFO_STATUS);
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -1255,7 +1254,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_trig_try_reen(struct iio_trigger *trig)
> }
>
> static int bmc150_accel_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
> - bool state)
> + bool state)
> {
> struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
> struct bmc150_accel_data *data = t->data;
> @@ -1314,26 +1313,32 @@ static int bmc150_accel_handle_roc_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> dir = IIO_EV_DIR_RISING;
>
> if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_X)
> - iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
> - 0,
> - IIO_MOD_X,
> - IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
> - dir),
> - data->timestamp);
> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
> + 0,
> + IIO_MOD_X,
> + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
> + dir),
> + data->timestamp);
> +
> if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_Y)
> - iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
> - 0,
> - IIO_MOD_Y,
> - IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
> - dir),
> - data->timestamp);
> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
> + 0,
> + IIO_MOD_Y,
> + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
> + dir),
> + data->timestamp);
> +
> if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_Z)
> - iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
> - 0,
> - IIO_MOD_Z,
> - IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
> - dir),
> - data->timestamp);
> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
> + 0,
> + IIO_MOD_Z,
> + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
> + dir),
> + data->timestamp);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1365,7 +1370,9 @@ static irqreturn_t bmc150_accel_irq_thread_handler(int irq, void *private)
> BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MODE_LATCH_INT |
> BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MODE_LATCH_RESET);
> if (ret)
> - dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_int_rst_latch\n");
> + dev_err(&data->client->dev,
> + "Error writing reg_int_rst_latch\n");
> +
> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> } else {
> ret = IRQ_NONE;
> @@ -1412,13 +1419,13 @@ static const char *bmc150_accel_match_acpi_device(struct device *dev, int *data)
> if (!id)
> return NULL;
>
> - *data = (int) id->driver_data;
> + *data = (int)id->driver_data;
>
> return dev_name(dev);
> }
>
> static int bmc150_accel_gpio_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> - struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
> + struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
> {
> struct device *dev;
> struct gpio_desc *gpio;
> --
> 2.3.6
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: make use of mask definition
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: make use of mask definition Hartmut Knaack
@ 2015-06-16 10:34 ` Octavian Purdila
2015-06-21 13:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Purdila @ 2015-06-16 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hartmut Knaack
Cc: linux-iio, Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Laurentiu Palcu
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de> wrote:
> BMC150_ACCEL_SLOPE_THRES_MASK was defined some time ago, but its 'magic'
> value got used instead in bmc150_accel_write_event(). Make use of it for
> improved readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> index cc5a357..36a9cd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_write_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> switch (info) {
> case IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE:
> - data->slope_thres = val & 0xFF;
> + data->slope_thres = val & BMC150_ACCEL_SLOPE_THRES_MASK;
> break;
> case IIO_EV_INFO_PERIOD:
> data->slope_dur = val & BMC150_ACCEL_SLOPE_DUR_MASK;
> --
> 2.3.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: fix counting direction
2015-06-16 10:31 ` Octavian Purdila
@ 2015-06-21 13:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2015-06-21 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Octavian Purdila, Hartmut Knaack
Cc: linux-iio, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Laurentiu Palcu
On 16/06/15 11:31, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> In bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers() triggers should be unregistered in
>> reverse order of registration. Trigger registration starts with number 0,
>> counting up. In consequence, trigger number needs to be count down here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
>
> Reviewed-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git and marked for stable.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> index 4e70f51..cc5a357 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static void bmc150_accel_unregister_triggers(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = from; i >= 0; i++) {
>> + for (i = from; i >= 0; i--) {
>> if (data->triggers[i].indio_trig) {
>> iio_trigger_unregister(data->triggers[i].indio_trig);
>> data->triggers[i].indio_trig = NULL;
>> --
>> 2.3.6
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: make use of mask definition
2015-06-16 10:34 ` Octavian Purdila
@ 2015-06-21 13:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2015-06-21 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Octavian Purdila, Hartmut Knaack
Cc: linux-iio, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Laurentiu Palcu
On 16/06/15 11:34, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de> wrote:
>> BMC150_ACCEL_SLOPE_THRES_MASK was defined some time ago, but its 'magic'
>> value got used instead in bmc150_accel_write_event(). Make use of it for
>> improved readability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
>
> Reviewed-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out as testing
etc etc.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> index cc5a357..36a9cd5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_write_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>
>> switch (info) {
>> case IIO_EV_INFO_VALUE:
>> - data->slope_thres = val & 0xFF;
>> + data->slope_thres = val & BMC150_ACCEL_SLOPE_THRES_MASK;
>> break;
>> case IIO_EV_INFO_PERIOD:
>> data->slope_dur = val & BMC150_ACCEL_SLOPE_DUR_MASK;
>> --
>> 2.3.6
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: code style cleanup
2015-06-16 10:33 ` Octavian Purdila
@ 2015-06-21 13:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2015-06-21 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Octavian Purdila, Hartmut Knaack
Cc: linux-iio, Lars-Peter Clausen, Peter Meerwald,
Srinivas Pandruvada, Laurentiu Palcu
On 16/06/15 11:33, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Apply the following coding style changes as indicated by checkpatch.pl in
>> strict mode:
>> - Please don't use multiple blank lines
>> - braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement (if/else)
>> - Alignment should match open parenthesis
>> - Please don't use multiple blank lines
>> - Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
>> - Missing a blank line after declarations
>> - No space is necessary after a cast
>>
>> Also wrap/consolidate error messages to fit 80 characters per line and
>> rework a comment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
>
> Reviewed-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git, initially pushed out as testing for the
autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> index 36a9cd5..e84e2a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.c
>> @@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ static const struct {
>> {500000, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_500_MS},
>> {1000000, BMC150_ACCEL_SLEEP_1_SEC} };
>>
>> -
>> static int bmc150_accel_set_mode(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
>> enum bmc150_power_modes mode,
>> int dur_us)
>> @@ -259,8 +258,9 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_mode(struct bmc150_accel_data *data,
>> dur_val =
>> bmc150_accel_sleep_value_table[i].reg_value;
>> }
>> - } else
>> + } else {
>> dur_val = 0;
>> + }
>>
>> if (dur_val < 0)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_bw(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int val,
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table); ++i) {
>> if (bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val == val &&
>> - bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val2 == val2) {
>> + bmc150_accel_samp_freq_table[i].val2 == val2) {
>> ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(
>> data->client,
>> BMC150_ACCEL_REG_PMU_BW,
>> @@ -351,8 +351,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>>
>> ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, BMC150_ACCEL_REG_CHIP_ID);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> - "Error: Reading chip id\n");
>> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error: Reading chip id\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -376,8 +375,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_chip_init(struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>> BMC150_ACCEL_REG_PMU_RANGE,
>> BMC150_ACCEL_DEF_RANGE_4G);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> - "Error writing reg_pmu_range\n");
>> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_pmu_range\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -437,12 +435,13 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_power_state(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, bool on)
>> {
>> int ret;
>>
>> - if (on)
>> + if (on) {
>> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&data->client->dev);
>> - else {
>> + } else {
>> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&data->client->dev);
>> ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&data->client->dev);
>> }
>> +
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> "Failed: bmc150_accel_set_power_state for %d\n", on);
>> @@ -514,13 +513,13 @@ static int bmc150_accel_set_interrupt(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int i,
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in
>> - * in reverse order. This will happen here anyway as our
>> - * resume operation uses sync mode runtime pm calls, the
>> - * suspend operation will be delayed by autosuspend delay
>> - * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse of
>> - * enable operation. When runtime pm is disabled the mode
>> - * is always on so sequence doesn't matter
>> + * We will expect the enable and disable to do operation in reverse
>> + * order. This will happen here anyway, as our resume operation uses
>> + * sync mode runtime pm calls. The suspend operation will be delayed
>> + * by autosuspend delay.
>> + * So the disable operation will still happen in reverse order of
>> + * enable operation. When runtime pm is disabled the mode is always on,
>> + * so sequence doesn't matter.
>> */
>> ret = bmc150_accel_set_power_state(data, state);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> @@ -574,7 +573,6 @@ out_fix_power_state:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -
>> static int bmc150_accel_set_scale(struct bmc150_accel_data *data, int val)
>> {
>> int ret, i;
>> @@ -674,8 +672,9 @@ static int bmc150_accel_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP) {
>> *val = BMC150_ACCEL_TEMP_CENTER_VAL;
>> return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> - } else
>> + } else {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>> *val = 0;
>> switch (chan->type) {
>> @@ -793,7 +792,6 @@ static int bmc150_accel_read_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> enum iio_event_type type,
>> enum iio_event_direction dir)
>> {
>> -
>> struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>
>> return data->ev_enable_state;
>> @@ -827,7 +825,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> }
>>
>> static int bmc150_accel_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> - struct iio_trigger *trig)
>> + struct iio_trigger *trig)
>> {
>> struct bmc150_accel_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> int i;
>> @@ -963,6 +961,7 @@ static int __bmc150_accel_fifo_flush(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>> u16 buffer[BMC150_ACCEL_FIFO_LENGTH * 3];
>> int64_t tstamp;
>> uint64_t sample_period;
>> +
>> ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
>> BMC150_ACCEL_REG_FIFO_STATUS);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> @@ -1255,7 +1254,7 @@ static int bmc150_accel_trig_try_reen(struct iio_trigger *trig)
>> }
>>
>> static int bmc150_accel_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
>> - bool state)
>> + bool state)
>> {
>> struct bmc150_accel_trigger *t = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
>> struct bmc150_accel_data *data = t->data;
>> @@ -1314,26 +1313,32 @@ static int bmc150_accel_handle_roc_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>> dir = IIO_EV_DIR_RISING;
>>
>> if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_X)
>> - iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> - 0,
>> - IIO_MOD_X,
>> - IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> - dir),
>> - data->timestamp);
>> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
>> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> + 0,
>> + IIO_MOD_X,
>> + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> + dir),
>> + data->timestamp);
>> +
>> if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_Y)
>> - iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> - 0,
>> - IIO_MOD_Y,
>> - IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> - dir),
>> - data->timestamp);
>> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
>> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> + 0,
>> + IIO_MOD_Y,
>> + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> + dir),
>> + data->timestamp);
>> +
>> if (ret & BMC150_ACCEL_ANY_MOTION_BIT_Z)
>> - iio_push_event(indio_dev, IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> - 0,
>> - IIO_MOD_Z,
>> - IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> - dir),
>> - data->timestamp);
>> + iio_push_event(indio_dev,
>> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL,
>> + 0,
>> + IIO_MOD_Z,
>> + IIO_EV_TYPE_ROC,
>> + dir),
>> + data->timestamp);
>> +
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1365,7 +1370,9 @@ static irqreturn_t bmc150_accel_irq_thread_handler(int irq, void *private)
>> BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MODE_LATCH_INT |
>> BMC150_ACCEL_INT_MODE_LATCH_RESET);
>> if (ret)
>> - dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_int_rst_latch\n");
>> + dev_err(&data->client->dev,
>> + "Error writing reg_int_rst_latch\n");
>> +
>> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>> } else {
>> ret = IRQ_NONE;
>> @@ -1412,13 +1419,13 @@ static const char *bmc150_accel_match_acpi_device(struct device *dev, int *data)
>> if (!id)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> - *data = (int) id->driver_data;
>> + *data = (int)id->driver_data;
>>
>> return dev_name(dev);
>> }
>>
>> static int bmc150_accel_gpio_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> - struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>> + struct bmc150_accel_data *data)
>> {
>> struct device *dev;
>> struct gpio_desc *gpio;
>> --
>> 2.3.6
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-21 13:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-15 21:48 [PATCH 0/3] bmc150-accel fixes and cleanup Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: fix counting direction Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-16 10:31 ` Octavian Purdila
2015-06-21 13:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: make use of mask definition Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-16 10:34 ` Octavian Purdila
2015-06-21 13:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-06-15 21:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio:accel:bmc150-accel: code style cleanup Hartmut Knaack
2015-06-16 10:33 ` Octavian Purdila
2015-06-21 13:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.