All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Probe regression of efuse@11f10000 on mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-juniper-sku16 running next-20240202
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:10:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47cdeac1-121d-4b1a-a3ac-e2affc7a2fc3@notapiano> (raw)

Hi,

KernelCI has identified a regression [1] on the
mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-juniper-sku16 machine running on next-20240202 compared to
next-20240118:

<4>[    0.627077] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/nvmem/devices/mtk-efuse0'
<4>[    0.634945] CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-next-20240202 #1
<4>[    0.642542] Hardware name: Google juniper sku16 board (DT)
<4>[    0.648237] Call trace:
<4>[    0.650917]  dump_backtrace+0x94/0xec
<4>[    0.654815]  show_stack+0x18/0x24
<4>[    0.658359]  dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x60
<4>[    0.662252]  dump_stack+0x18/0x24
<4>[    0.665796]  sysfs_warn_dup+0x64/0x80
<4>[    0.669688]  sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0xf0/0xf8
<4>[    0.674353]  sysfs_create_link+0x20/0x40
<4>[    0.678500]  bus_add_device+0x64/0x104
<4>[    0.682475]  device_add+0x33c/0x778
<4>[    0.686193]  nvmem_register+0x514/0x714
<4>[    0.690256]  devm_nvmem_register+0x1c/0x6c
<4>[    0.694577]  mtk_efuse_probe+0xe8/0x170
<4>[    0.698637]  platform_probe+0x68/0xd8
<4>[    0.702525]  really_probe+0x148/0x2b4
<4>[    0.706413]  __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c
<4>[    0.710990]  driver_probe_device+0xdc/0x160
<4>[    0.715394]  __driver_attach+0x94/0x19c
<4>[    0.719453]  bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xd4
<4>[    0.723512]  driver_attach+0x24/0x30
<4>[    0.727312]  bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x1e8
<4>[    0.731284]  driver_register+0x60/0x128
<4>[    0.735343]  __platform_driver_register+0x28/0x34
<4>[    0.740265]  mtk_efuse_init+0x20/0x5c
<4>[    0.744155]  do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x1b0
<4>[    0.748214]  kernel_init_freeable+0x1c8/0x290
<4>[    0.752795]  kernel_init+0x20/0x1dc
<4>[    0.756512]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
<4>[    0.760353] mediatek,efuse: probe of 11f10000.efuse failed with error -17

This efuse probe failure causes the probe failure of other components that
depend on it, including the display pipeline:

/soc/dsi-phy@11e50000
/soc/dsi@14014000
/soc/efuse@11f10000
/soc/i2c@11008000/anx7625@58
/soc/i2c@11008000/anx7625@58/aux-bus/panel
/soc/thermal@1100b000

There is a series already addressing the issue [2]. The first two patches have
been merged into the mediatek tree, but that tree isn't currently being
integrated into linux-next. Besides that, patch 3 hasn't been merged into the
nvmem tree yet, and it is required in order to solve the issue.

I'm sending this regression report so we can properly track the regression while
the fixes don't land on linux-next.

Thanks,
Nícolas

[1] https://linux.kernelci.org/test/plan/id/65bd63c3f12d8a95e200a225/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20240130095656.3712469-1-wenst@chromium.org/

#regzbot introduced next-20240118..next-20240202

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Probe regression of efuse@11f10000 on mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-juniper-sku16 running next-20240202
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:10:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47cdeac1-121d-4b1a-a3ac-e2affc7a2fc3@notapiano> (raw)

Hi,

KernelCI has identified a regression [1] on the
mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-juniper-sku16 machine running on next-20240202 compared to
next-20240118:

<4>[    0.627077] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/nvmem/devices/mtk-efuse0'
<4>[    0.634945] CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-next-20240202 #1
<4>[    0.642542] Hardware name: Google juniper sku16 board (DT)
<4>[    0.648237] Call trace:
<4>[    0.650917]  dump_backtrace+0x94/0xec
<4>[    0.654815]  show_stack+0x18/0x24
<4>[    0.658359]  dump_stack_lvl+0x48/0x60
<4>[    0.662252]  dump_stack+0x18/0x24
<4>[    0.665796]  sysfs_warn_dup+0x64/0x80
<4>[    0.669688]  sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0xf0/0xf8
<4>[    0.674353]  sysfs_create_link+0x20/0x40
<4>[    0.678500]  bus_add_device+0x64/0x104
<4>[    0.682475]  device_add+0x33c/0x778
<4>[    0.686193]  nvmem_register+0x514/0x714
<4>[    0.690256]  devm_nvmem_register+0x1c/0x6c
<4>[    0.694577]  mtk_efuse_probe+0xe8/0x170
<4>[    0.698637]  platform_probe+0x68/0xd8
<4>[    0.702525]  really_probe+0x148/0x2b4
<4>[    0.706413]  __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c
<4>[    0.710990]  driver_probe_device+0xdc/0x160
<4>[    0.715394]  __driver_attach+0x94/0x19c
<4>[    0.719453]  bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xd4
<4>[    0.723512]  driver_attach+0x24/0x30
<4>[    0.727312]  bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x1e8
<4>[    0.731284]  driver_register+0x60/0x128
<4>[    0.735343]  __platform_driver_register+0x28/0x34
<4>[    0.740265]  mtk_efuse_init+0x20/0x5c
<4>[    0.744155]  do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x1b0
<4>[    0.748214]  kernel_init_freeable+0x1c8/0x290
<4>[    0.752795]  kernel_init+0x20/0x1dc
<4>[    0.756512]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
<4>[    0.760353] mediatek,efuse: probe of 11f10000.efuse failed with error -17

This efuse probe failure causes the probe failure of other components that
depend on it, including the display pipeline:

/soc/dsi-phy@11e50000
/soc/dsi@14014000
/soc/efuse@11f10000
/soc/i2c@11008000/anx7625@58
/soc/i2c@11008000/anx7625@58/aux-bus/panel
/soc/thermal@1100b000

There is a series already addressing the issue [2]. The first two patches have
been merged into the mediatek tree, but that tree isn't currently being
integrated into linux-next. Besides that, patch 3 hasn't been merged into the
nvmem tree yet, and it is required in order to solve the issue.

I'm sending this regression report so we can properly track the regression while
the fixes don't land on linux-next.

Thanks,
Nícolas

[1] https://linux.kernelci.org/test/plan/id/65bd63c3f12d8a95e200a225/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20240130095656.3712469-1-wenst@chromium.org/

#regzbot introduced next-20240118..next-20240202

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06 16:10 Nícolas F. R. A. Prado [this message]
2024-02-06 16:10 ` Probe regression of efuse@11f10000 on mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-juniper-sku16 running next-20240202 Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2024-03-08 14:31 ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2024-03-08 14:31   ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2024-03-09 14:06   ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-03-09 14:06     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-03-11 13:54     ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2024-03-11 13:54       ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47cdeac1-121d-4b1a-a3ac-e2affc7a2fc3@notapiano \
    --to=nfraprado@collabora.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.