From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676EDC433EF for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 08:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28204208CB for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 08:07:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 28204208CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754796AbeFNIHS (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 04:07:18 -0400 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([195.201.40.130]:48122 "EHLO lithops.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752874AbeFNIHQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 04:07:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219A860A04BF; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:07:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 0IGnJxIcKGDn; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22C560A04C3; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ScAmLpeKw-ko; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blindfold.localnet (unknown [82.150.214.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B266760A04BF; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:07:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Weinberger To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Quentin Schulz , marek.vasut@gmail.com, dedekind1@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ubi: introduce ubi.nocheck parameter to skip CRC check when attaching ubi vol Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:07:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4831753.6lg8f61FNt@blindfold> In-Reply-To: <20180614100436.40741c67@bbrezillon> References: <95e04a201ac4ef82e68ce8e0c4f548b193e51b55.1524214122.git-series.quentin.schulz@bootlin.com> <1588647.N1yrutfcI7@blindfold> <20180614100436.40741c67@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2018, 10:04:36 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:29:42 +0200 > Richard Weinberger wrote: > > > Quentin, > > > > Am Montag, 11. Juni 2018, 12:20:37 CEST schrieb Quentin Schulz: > > > If we go for a per-image flag, adding nocheck to the ioctl makes sense, > > > otherwise we have to find a way to select only one or more volumes for > > > which the nocheck flag should be set. That being said, I'm not sure a > > > per-image flag is the way we want to go. > > > > > > What are your thoughts on this? > > > > I like that approach a lot more, please send a patch. :-) > > I don't think the approach you're talking about has been mentioned by > Quentin in this email :-). To clarify the discussion, we're talking > about adding a new flag to VTBL entries telling whether the CRC should > be skipped or not. Hehe yes. Too many discussions on and off-list in parallel. ;) Thanks, //richard