From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Subject: [PATCH] drm/msm/adreno: Do not propagate void return values Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:53:20 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <483795c4fb7d215a3f2089c55df29a0064eb021b.1653051029.git.geert@linux-m68k.org> (raw) With sparse ("make C=2"), lots of error: return expression in void function messages are seen. Fix this by removing the return statements to propagate void return values. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c index 3e325e2a2b1b68eb..d137136d93f3b4ca 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static void a6xx_rpmh_stop(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu) static inline void pdc_write(void __iomem *ptr, u32 offset, u32 value) { - return msm_writel(value, ptr + (offset << 2)); + msm_writel(value, ptr + (offset << 2)); } static void __iomem *a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h index 84bd516f01e895b2..e034935b3986f9f2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static inline u32 gmu_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset) static inline void gmu_write(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset, u32 value) { - return msm_writel(value, gmu->mmio + (offset << 2)); + msm_writel(value, gmu->mmio + (offset << 2)); } static inline void @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline u32 gmu_read_rscc(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset) static inline void gmu_write_rscc(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset, u32 value) { - return msm_writel(value, gmu->rscc + (offset << 2)); + msm_writel(value, gmu->rscc + (offset << 2)); } #define gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, addr, val, cond, interval, timeout) \ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c index ccc4fcf7a630f49a..d671b75f3289fdff 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c @@ -1446,7 +1446,7 @@ static void a6xx_llc_rmw(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 or) static void a6xx_llc_write(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, u32 reg, u32 value) { - return msm_writel(value, a6xx_gpu->llc_mmio + (reg << 2)); + msm_writel(value, a6xx_gpu->llc_mmio + (reg << 2)); } static void a6xx_llc_deactivate(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu) -- 2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Subject: [PATCH] drm/msm/adreno: Do not propagate void return values Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:53:20 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <483795c4fb7d215a3f2089c55df29a0064eb021b.1653051029.git.geert@linux-m68k.org> (raw) With sparse ("make C=2"), lots of error: return expression in void function messages are seen. Fix this by removing the return statements to propagate void return values. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c index 3e325e2a2b1b68eb..d137136d93f3b4ca 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static void a6xx_rpmh_stop(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu) static inline void pdc_write(void __iomem *ptr, u32 offset, u32 value) { - return msm_writel(value, ptr + (offset << 2)); + msm_writel(value, ptr + (offset << 2)); } static void __iomem *a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h index 84bd516f01e895b2..e034935b3986f9f2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static inline u32 gmu_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset) static inline void gmu_write(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset, u32 value) { - return msm_writel(value, gmu->mmio + (offset << 2)); + msm_writel(value, gmu->mmio + (offset << 2)); } static inline void @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline u32 gmu_read_rscc(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset) static inline void gmu_write_rscc(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset, u32 value) { - return msm_writel(value, gmu->rscc + (offset << 2)); + msm_writel(value, gmu->rscc + (offset << 2)); } #define gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, addr, val, cond, interval, timeout) \ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c index ccc4fcf7a630f49a..d671b75f3289fdff 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c @@ -1446,7 +1446,7 @@ static void a6xx_llc_rmw(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 or) static void a6xx_llc_write(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, u32 reg, u32 value) { - return msm_writel(value, a6xx_gpu->llc_mmio + (reg << 2)); + msm_writel(value, a6xx_gpu->llc_mmio + (reg << 2)); } static void a6xx_llc_deactivate(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu) -- 2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 12:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-05-20 12:53 Geert Uytterhoeven [this message] 2022-05-20 12:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2022-05-20 13:14 ` Guenter Roeck 2022-05-20 13:14 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=483795c4fb7d215a3f2089c55df29a0064eb021b.1653051029.git.geert@linux-m68k.org \ --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \ --cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \ --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \ --cc=sean@poorly.run \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/adreno: Do not propagate void return values' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.