Re: #KCIDB engagement report

[Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>]

+kernelci@lists.linux.dev (new KernelCI mailing list)

On 17/11/2022 11:28, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Below is the monthly* report on KCIDB** engagement. It lists various CI
> systems and their status of engagement with KCIDB, as well as developer
> engagement.
> 
> Lines with updates are marked with "!".
> 
> Main news are: Intel's 0day CI has been sending their data to production for a
> while, and are looking to expand their contribution, Microsoft moving closer
> to sending their data, and the proposal for known-issue schema is going out
> soon, after preliminary implementation and testing is complete.
> 
> CI Engagement Status
> 
>     KernelCI native
>         Sending (a lot of) production build and test results.
>         https://kcidb.kernelci.org/?var-origin=kernelci
> 
>     Red Hat CKI
>         Sending production results.
>         https://kcidb.kernelci.org/?var-origin=redhat
> 
>     Google Syzbot
>         Sending a subset of production results (failures only).
>         https://kcidb.kernelci.org/?var-origin=syzbot
> 
>     ARM
>         Sending production results.
>         Full commit hashes are currently not available, are spoofed, and don't
>         match the ones reported by others. There's ongoing switch to using a
>         KernelCI instance setup, which should fix this.
>         https://kcidb.kernelci.org/?var-origin=arm
> 
>     Sony Fuego
>         Internal design in progress.
> 
>     Gentoo GKernelCI
>         Sending production results.
>         Only builds (a few architectures), no configs, no logs, and no tests
>         for now, but working on growing contributions.
>         https://kcidb.kernelci.org/?var-origin=gkernelci
> 
>     Intel 0day
> !       Sending production results.
> !       Mainline builds and kselftest results.
> !       https://kcidb.kernelci.org/?var-origin=0dayci
> 
>     Linaro
>         Sending (a lot of) Tuxsuite build results to "production" KCIDB.
>         https://kcidb.kernelci.org/?var-origin=tuxsuite
> 
>     TuxML
>         Initial contact in response to a report.
>         There's a plan to approach us and start work in the coming months.
> 
>     Yocto Project
>         Initial contact in response to a report.
>         Would like to start sending build and test results, particularly for
>         older kernels. Would like to separate upstream commits from project
>         patches first: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14196
> 
>     Huawei Compass CI
>         Sent a message to Fengguang Wu, who was presenting it at LVC 2021.
>         No response so far.
> 
>     Microsoft
>         Johnson George was filled in on the details of submission process.
> 
> Please respond with corrections or suggestions of other CI systems to contact.
> 
> Thank you!
> Nick
> 
> *More-or-less :)
> 
> **KCIDB is an effort to unify Linux Kernel CI reporting, maintained by Linux
>   Foundation's KernelCI project:
>   https://foundation.kernelci.org/blog/2020/08/21/introducing-common-reporting/
> 
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#1619): https://groups.io/g/kernelci/message/1619
> Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/95087111/924702
> Mute #kcidb:https://groups.io/g/kernelci/mutehashtag/kcidb
> Group Owner: kernelci+owner@groups.io
> Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/kernelci/unsub [guillaume.tucker@collabora.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
>