From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755946AbYH0MGQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:06:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754928AbYH0MGB (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:06:01 -0400 Received: from victor.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.26]:34883 "EHLO victor.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754820AbYH0MGA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:06:00 -0400 Message-ID: <48B5428E.40902@novell.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:03:26 -0400 From: Gregory Haskins User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080720) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: Peter Zijlstra , mingo@elte.hu, srostedt@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, gregory.haskins@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair References: <20080826173131.16413.17862.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <20080826173500.16413.40514.stgit@dev.haskins.net> <1219825295.6462.54.camel@twins> <20080827102646.GA5818@wotan.suse.de> <1219833668.6462.72.camel@twins> <20080827105615.GB5818@wotan.suse.de> <20080827105731.GC5818@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20080827105731.GC5818@wotan.suse.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D8195319 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4FEA1A4FF757EFD063FEB615" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4FEA1A4FF757EFD063FEB615 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nick Piggin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:56:15PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > =20 >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:41:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> =20 >>> Does it make sense to make this _double_lock_balance() thing depend o= n >>> that too? >>> =20 >> Hmm, you might have a good point there. Greg? >> >> BTW. I wonder about other architectures that are of interest to -rt? L= ike >> mips or arm perhaps... Any plans to implement ticket locks on those, o= r >> do they not tend to be used in SMP configurations on -rt yte? >> =20 > > Oh, or maybe I guess again: -rt might be using Greg's generic ticket lo= ck > implementation? > =20 I never submitted them since yours were better for x86. But I can dust them off and post -Greg --------------enig4FEA1A4FF757EFD063FEB615 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAki1Qo4ACgkQlOSOBdgZUxnF8ACfV2pGDvAl1AS3DDPrwEgNFkMe CuQAn1OVQ/I+Tn/Xk/TeTnYpMM6j4b9e =63ZK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4FEA1A4FF757EFD063FEB615--