From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:02:52 +0100
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [GFS2 PATCH][v7] GFS2: Non-recursive delete
In-Reply-To: <887913590.16137126.1492351902506.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <840728300.14458393.1492007616440.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
	<4ee6537a-5b9b-e02d-4e3f-a6e778b41601@redhat.com>
	<887913590.16137126.1492351902506.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <48af8cbf-ae18-e4c6-5e5a-e57e2444b4db@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,


On 16/04/17 15:11, Bob Peterson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> | Hi,
> |
> | That is certainly looking a lot cleaner. It would be good to expand the
> | check in message for the patch so that it explains the new state machine
> | clearly. Have you tried testing with fsx? That is a good plan for
> | anything affecting truncate,
> |
> | Steve.
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> I expanded the message as requested. Also, I ran fsx for several days
> and all the tests passed with the non-recursive delete. When I finally
> hit ctrl-c, it said:
>
> ^Csignal 2
> testcalls = 1113823746
>
> Regards,
>
> Bob Peterson
> Red Hat File Systems

Ok, sounds like it is looking good at this stage then. Are there any 
other tests that we could usefully run? If not then it sounds like it is 
getting towards time to queue it up for merging,

Steve.