All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] future: Update Locking and HTM comparison tables
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 00:00:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49209cfd-5494-fc54-ba4b-f8389ba4aed7@gmail.com> (raw)

From d6497dadbc973d7d94591f48730c4c0ce1c129a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:40:04 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] future: Update Locking and HTM comparison tables

Hi Paul,

I have tackled the remaining two tables of old style in Section 17.3.
"Advantage", "Disadvantage", and "Strong Disadvantage" can be indicated
by background colors, and their structures can be simplified.
This scheme is inspired by Table 12.4, with using lower saturation
colors.

Patch #1 modifies the tables.
Patch #2 adds a merged table of the two as a sidewaystable.

Background colors are chosen so that they can be distinguished
when they are printed in grayscale.

Thoughts?

        Thanks, Akira
--
Akira Yokosawa (2):
  future: Update Locking and HTM comparison tables
  future: Add merged table of locking & HTM comparison

 appendix/styleguide/styleguide.tex |   6 -
 future/HTMtable.tex                | 201 ++++++++++++++---------------
 future/HTMtableColor.tex           |   9 ++
 future/HTMtableFull.tex            | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++
 future/HTMtableRCU.tex             | 254 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
 future/htm.tex                     |   6 +
 perfbook.tex                       |   1 +
 7 files changed, 370 insertions(+), 255 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 future/HTMtableColor.tex
 create mode 100644 future/HTMtableFull.tex

-- 
2.7.4


             reply	other threads:[~2017-12-06 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-06 15:00 Akira Yokosawa [this message]
2017-12-06 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] future: Update Locking and HTM comparison tables Akira Yokosawa
2017-12-06 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] future: Add merged table of locking & HTM comparison Akira Yokosawa
2017-12-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 0/2] future: Update Locking and HTM comparison tables Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-06 22:16   ` Akira Yokosawa
2017-12-06 22:19 ` [PATCH v2 " Akira Yokosawa
2017-12-06 22:20   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Akira Yokosawa
2017-12-06 22:22   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] future: Add merged table of locking & HTM comparison Akira Yokosawa
2017-12-06 22:54   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] future: Update Locking and HTM comparison tables Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49209cfd-5494-fc54-ba4b-f8389ba4aed7@gmail.com \
    --to=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=perfbook@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.