From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754263AbYLGNgl (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 08:36:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753803AbYLGNg2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 08:36:28 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:20888 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753696AbYLGNg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 08:36:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=SV0AIjozFWIfAecAZEKJ11HIBcj5ZmkglH44CEr5z71v50Ex/6slt32oyFu/4L18xA YVsRbX9/UDU0bk8G3b11Y50UNJ3wjViyXuBV4kDQ6EjdEl6T2NnOkh+aYfm2f0AuffHY HQr71IyiM4GTnZIpybs5qWXYCFT9mIeXzNfN8= Message-ID: <493BD14E.6020606@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 14:36:14 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: Michael Tokarev , Mark McLoughlin , linux-kernel , kvm , Anthony Liguori , Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: make PCI devices take a virtio_pci module ref References: <1228394671.3732.77.camel@blaa> <4938EE0B.8020501@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <493929D2.4070900@gmail.com> <200812071900.08987.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200812071900.08987.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell wrote: >> Fix the virtio bus instead. > > Incoherent? CHECK Sorry, I don't undesratnd here. Incoherent with what? > Rude to bug reporter? CHECK Maybe it's my english. I apologize all, who understood my replies that way, sorry for that, it was not intentional. > Unhelpful? CHECK I don't know, I expect people to ask for concrete implementation details, if they don't know. Ok, pointing to the relevant documentation next time would be better, I agree.