From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver/net: remove unnecessary macro for
	unused variables
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:17:43 +0100
Message-ID: <493e9af9-a800-4642-e40f-ab15e234d7ad@intel.com>
References: <20170512103303.93161-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F7C234
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 15 May 2017 11:17:45 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20170512103303.93161-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 5/12/2017 11:33 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> remove __rte_unused instances that are not required.
> 

Hi Yuanhan,

Does this kind of refactoring patches, specially the ones covering
multiple drivers, cause trouble (more conflicts) to you while getting
patches for stable trees?

If so, I can postpone them through the end of integration deadline.

But postponing them most probably will mean rebasing these patches
later, so if this is not causing any problem for you, please let me know
so that I can get them earlier.

Thanks,
ferruh