From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from blaine.gmane.org ([80.91.229.8]:41449 "EHLO hugh.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756766AbYLLLbc (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:31:32 -0500 Received: from public by hugh.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LB6Ey-00057v-DO for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:31:28 +0100 Message-ID: <49424B7A.9060700@redhat.com> (sfid-20081212_123136_927918_114DFF6A) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:31:06 +0100 From: Zdenek Kabelac MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" CC: reinette chatre , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" Subject: Re: iwlagn interrupt problem References: <1228929548.18730.21.camel@rc-desk> <49424419.1090103@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Alexander E. Patrakov napsal(a): > 2008/12/12 Zdenek Kabelac : >> I assume that this backtrace I've got with 2.6.28-rc7 is the same issue ? > > No, this is different. My issue is with unacceptable latency when > bringing the interface down. In your dmesg, the interface was never > brought up or down. > Hmm - it was something like an hour after resume when the problem started, Here is timed part of the same backtrace: [65627.782972] wlan0: associate with AP 00:11:d8:da:65:40 [65627.785569] wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:11:d8:da:65:40 (capab=0x401 status=0 aid=8) [65627.785576] wlan0: associated [69541.209873] wlan0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:11:d8:da:65:40 - assume out of range [69541.810104] iwl3945: Error sending REPLY_SCAN_CMD: time out after 500ms. [69542.309861] iwl3945: Error sending REPLY_RXON_ASSOC: time out after 500ms. The begging of my trace looked similar. Should I open new bugzilla separately ? Zdenek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757767AbYLLLbf (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:31:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752344AbYLLLb0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:31:26 -0500 Received: from blaine.gmane.org ([80.91.229.8]:41404 "EHLO hugh.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751391AbYLLLb0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:31:26 -0500 Message-ID: <49424B7A.9060700@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:31:06 +0100 From: Zdenek Kabelac Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" CC: reinette chatre , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" Subject: Re: iwlagn interrupt problem References: <1228929548.18730.21.camel@rc-desk> <49424419.1090103@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander E. Patrakov napsal(a): > 2008/12/12 Zdenek Kabelac : >> I assume that this backtrace I've got with 2.6.28-rc7 is the same issue ? > > No, this is different. My issue is with unacceptable latency when > bringing the interface down. In your dmesg, the interface was never > brought up or down. > Hmm - it was something like an hour after resume when the problem started, Here is timed part of the same backtrace: [65627.782972] wlan0: associate with AP 00:11:d8:da:65:40 [65627.785569] wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:11:d8:da:65:40 (capab=0x401 status=0 aid=8) [65627.785576] wlan0: associated [69541.209873] wlan0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:11:d8:da:65:40 - assume out of range [69541.810104] iwl3945: Error sending REPLY_SCAN_CMD: time out after 500ms. [69542.309861] iwl3945: Error sending REPLY_RXON_ASSOC: time out after 500ms. The begging of my trace looked similar. Should I open new bugzilla separately ? Zdenek