From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:31:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49504c79-2cd4-1707-a0a5-79b679a4b214@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
On 24/06/21 05:57, David Stevens wrote:
> static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
> - int map_writable, int max_level, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> + int map_writable, int max_level,
> + const struct kvm_pfn_page *pfnpg,
> bool prefault, bool is_tdp)
> {
> bool nx_huge_page_workaround_enabled = is_nx_huge_pa
So the main difference with my tentative patches is that here I was
passing the struct by value. I'll try to clean this up for 5.15, but
for now it's all good like this. Thanks again!
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:31:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49504c79-2cd4-1707-a0a5-79b679a4b214@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
On 24/06/21 05:57, David Stevens wrote:
> static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
> - int map_writable, int max_level, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> + int map_writable, int max_level,
> + const struct kvm_pfn_page *pfnpg,
> bool prefault, bool is_tdp)
> {
> bool nx_huge_page_workaround_enabled = is_nx_huge_pa
So the main difference with my tentative patches is that here I was
passing the struct by value. I'll try to clean this up for 5.15, but
for now it's all good like this. Thanks again!
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:31:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49504c79-2cd4-1707-a0a5-79b679a4b214@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
On 24/06/21 05:57, David Stevens wrote:
> static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
> - int map_writable, int max_level, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> + int map_writable, int max_level,
> + const struct kvm_pfn_page *pfnpg,
> bool prefault, bool is_tdp)
> {
> bool nx_huge_page_workaround_enabled = is_nx_huge_pa
So the main difference with my tentative patches is that here I was
passing the struct by value. I'll try to clean this up for 5.15, but
for now it's all good like this. Thanks again!
Paolo
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:31:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49504c79-2cd4-1707-a0a5-79b679a4b214@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
On 24/06/21 05:57, David Stevens wrote:
> static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
> - int map_writable, int max_level, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> + int map_writable, int max_level,
> + const struct kvm_pfn_page *pfnpg,
> bool prefault, bool is_tdp)
> {
> bool nx_huge_page_workaround_enabled = is_nx_huge_pa
So the main difference with my tentative patches is that here I was
passing the struct by value. I'll try to clean this up for 5.15, but
for now it's all good like this. Thanks again!
Paolo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:31:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49504c79-2cd4-1707-a0a5-79b679a4b214@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
On 24/06/21 05:57, David Stevens wrote:
> static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
> - int map_writable, int max_level, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> + int map_writable, int max_level,
> + const struct kvm_pfn_page *pfnpg,
> bool prefault, bool is_tdp)
> {
> bool nx_huge_page_workaround_enabled = is_nx_huge_pa
So the main difference with my tentative patches is that here I was
passing the struct by value. I'll try to clean this up for 5.15, but
for now it's all good like this. Thanks again!
Paolo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:31:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49504c79-2cd4-1707-a0a5-79b679a4b214@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624035749.4054934-4-stevensd@google.com>
On 24/06/21 05:57, David Stevens wrote:
> static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
> - int map_writable, int max_level, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> + int map_writable, int max_level,
> + const struct kvm_pfn_page *pfnpg,
> bool prefault, bool is_tdp)
> {
> bool nx_huge_page_workaround_enabled = is_nx_huge_pa
So the main difference with my tentative patches is that here I was
passing the struct by value. I'll try to clean this up for 5.15, but
for now it's all good like this. Thanks again!
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 213+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-24 3:57 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: release audited pfns David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: mmu: also return page from gfn_to_pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 9:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: avoid struct page in MMU David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 7:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 8:58 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64/mmu: " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 10:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: mmu: remove over-aggressive warnings David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gvt: use gfn_to_pfn's page instead of pfn David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 3:57 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 4:28 ` David Stevens
2021-06-24 10:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 10:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-24 4:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU Patchwork
2021-06-24 6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 10:34 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 11:42 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 12:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-24 15:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 0:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-25 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-06-24 16:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for KVM: Remove uses of struct page from x86 and arm64 MMU (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49504c79-2cd4-1707-a0a5-79b679a4b214@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.