From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4958FC75.3020606@domain.hid>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:36:05 +0000
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20081223190649.26094.61372.stgit@domain.hid>
	<49513A4F.2060700@domain.hid> <49518900.5040504@domain.hid>
	<4951E402.8000702@domain.hid> <4958DF63.5060005@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <4958DF63.5060005@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH v2 0/5] NMI watchdog fixes / enhancements
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Regarding this thread, I would appreciate if we could just stay on
>>> topic. If you don't have the time for the patches, then it's absolutely
>>> OK, just leave them alone.
>> I am reluctant to test patches which are explicitely labeled as
>> "untested", and prefer to wait the tested ones. Trunk is already broken
>> enough, that is my point.
>>
> 
> Oh, that was a misunderstanding due to my unfortunate changelog.
> Untested referred to a specific config set and a last-minute change of
> the previous version.

Ok. Forget about solving the issue on ARM, I have to solve it now.

-- 
                                                 Gilles.