From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753422AbZAEQ2U (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:28:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751465AbZAEQ2M (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:28:12 -0500 Received: from nat-warsl417-01.aon.at ([195.3.96.119]:60166 "EHLO email.aon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750890AbZAEQ2L (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:28:11 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 402 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:28:10 EST Message-ID: <49623384.2070801@aon.at> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:21:24 +0100 From: Peter Klotz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Piggin CC: Christoph Hellwig , Roman Kononov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem? References: <20081223171259.GA11945@infradead.org> <20081230042333.GC27679@wotan.suse.de> <20090103214443.GA6612@infradead.org> <20090105014821.GA367@wotan.suse.de> <20090105041959.GC367@wotan.suse.de> <20090105064838.GA5209@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20090105064838.GA5209@wotan.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > I believe this patch should solve it. Please test and confirm before > I send it upstream. My test successfully completed two times, writing a 900GB file in each run. I used a patched 2.6.27.10 x86_64 kernel. On an unpatched system this test usually fails before reaching 100GB. Thank you for fixing this issue that quick. Regards, Peter. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n05GM1BA000637 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:22:01 -0600 Received: from email.aon.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6BCC16140A for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:21:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from email.aon.at (nat-warsl417-02.aon.at [195.3.96.120]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 8kgcE7aDSuiEHP2g for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:21:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from smarthub93.highway.telekom.at (HELO email.aon.at) ([172.18.5.237]) (envelope-sender ) by fallback44.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Jan 2009 16:21:58 -0000 Message-ID: <49623384.2070801@aon.at> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:21:24 +0100 From: Peter Klotz MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem? References: <20081223171259.GA11945@infradead.org> <20081230042333.GC27679@wotan.suse.de> <20090103214443.GA6612@infradead.org> <20090105014821.GA367@wotan.suse.de> <20090105041959.GC367@wotan.suse.de> <20090105064838.GA5209@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20090105064838.GA5209@wotan.suse.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Nick Piggin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Kononov , xfs@oss.sgi.com Nick Piggin wrote: > I believe this patch should solve it. Please test and confirm before > I send it upstream. My test successfully completed two times, writing a 900GB file in each run. I used a patched 2.6.27.10 x86_64 kernel. On an unpatched system this test usually fails before reaching 100GB. Thank you for fixing this issue that quick. Regards, Peter. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs