From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] app/testpmd: fix ports list after removing several at once Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 19:06:11 +0200 Message-ID: <49681498.CPYSGzZmHV@xps> References: <20180907233929.21950-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <4688337.PUasVPICMu@xps> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260D12F43@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "arybchenko@solarflare.com" , "ophirmu@mellanox.com" , "rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com" , Wisam Jaddo To: "Iremonger, Bernard" Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC5E1B143 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 19:06:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260D12F43@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/10/2018 18:42, Iremonger, Bernard: > Hi Thomas, > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > 18/10/2018 13:41, Iremonger, Bernard: > > > Hi Thomas > > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > > > 18/10/2018 12:40, Iremonger, Bernard: > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Wisam Jaddo > > > > > > > > > > > > When detaching a port, the full rte_device is removed. > > > > > > If the rte_device was hosting several ports, the testpmd list of > > > > > > ports must be updated for multiple removals. > > > > > > > > > > ./devtools/check-git-log.sh -1 > > > > > Missing 'Fixes' tag: > > > > > app/testpmd: fix ports list after removing several at once > > > > > > > > I think it is OK. > > > > It is fixing a case which was not tested before. > > > > And we don't really need to backport it. > > > > > > If "fix" is removed from the commit message then the fixes line will not be > > needed. > > > However if it is a real fix, then I think fixes line should be added . > > > > I know, I am the one implementing this check :-) If I add a Fixes: line, it will warn > > about a lack of Cc:stable. > > But we don't need to backport this. > > That's why I think we can ignore this warning. > > > > Reminder: it is just warning, not a mandatory requirement. > > > > > As this does not seem to be a normal "fix", how about replacing "fix" with something like "update", then there will be no warning to ignore. > Better not have warnings. Yes, I thought about it and felt that "update" would not have the same meaning. If nobody has a better idea, I will replace with "update" instead of "fix".