From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Message-ID: <496FE555.7090405@rogers.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:39:33 -0500 From: CityK MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Verkuil References: <7994.62.70.2.252.1232028088.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <7994.62.70.2.252.1232028088.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: V4L , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Michael Krufky , Josh Borke , David Lonie , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: KWorld ATSC 115 all static List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Hans Verkuil wrote: > is your board suppossed to have a tda9887 as well? Hi Hans, Yes, indeed, the device does contain the tda9887. >> Hans' changes are not enough to fix the ATSC115 issue. >> > > Ah, OK. > > >> I believe that if you can confirm that the same problem exists, but the >> previous workaround continues to work even after Hans' changes, then I >> believe that confirms that Hans' changes Do the Right Thing (tm). >> err, I'm afraid I might be reading to much into your statement Michael --- if you meant to question whether, after building Hans' changes, a "modprobe tuner -r" and "modprobe tuner " worked, then the answer is no, such did not work. (no results in dmesg are observed either, much like what was discussed later; specifically: > we are no longer able to remove the "tuner" module and modprobe it again -- > the second modprobe will not allow for an attach, as there will be no > way for the module to be recognized > If you had meant taking Hans' source and applying your "hack" patch to them, building and then proceeding with the modprobe steps, the answer is that I haven't tried yet. Will test -- might not be tonight though, as I have some other things that need attending too. > Anyway, if the previous workaround works after Hans' changes, then I > think his changes should be merged -- even though it doesnt fix ATSC115, > it is indeed a step into the right direction. > > If the ATSC115 hack-fix patch doesn't apply anymore, please let me know > -- I'll respin it. Given this statement, then perhaps it was a case of the latter. As mentioned, I will rebuild and test. Hans, given the discussion that is developed, I don't think the dmesg output is necessary at this point (if you really insist though I will provide :P ). P.S. I think Trent's idea sounds interesting/warrants some consideration. -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list