Re: [PATCH] net/fm10k: convert to new Rx/Tx offloads API

["Dai, Wei" <wei.dai@intel.com>]

Thank you, Zhang Qi for your feedback.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 11:55 AM
> To: Dai, Wei <wei.dai@intel.com>; Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/fm10k: convert to new Rx/Tx offloads API
> 
> Hi Daiwei:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dai, Wei
> > Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 10:11 PM
> > To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Wang, Xiao W
> > <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dai, Wei <wei.dai@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] net/fm10k: convert to new Rx/Tx offloads API
> >
> > Ethdev Rx offloads API has changed since:
> > commit ce17eddefc20 ("ethdev: introduce Rx queue offloads API") Ethdev
> > Tx offloads API has changed since:
> > commit cba7f53b717d ("ethdev: introduce Tx queue offloads API") This
> > commit support the new Rx and Tx offloads API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h          |  7 +++++++
> >  drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c   | 33
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c |  6 +++---
> >  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h
> > index
> > 30dad3e..57bd533 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h
> > @@ -108,6 +108,11 @@
> >
> >  #define FM10K_SIMPLE_TX_FLAG
> > ((uint32_t)ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS | \
> >  				ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOOFFLOADS)
> > +#define FM10K_SIMPLE_TX_OFFLOADS
> > ((uint64_t)(DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS  | \
> > +					     DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT | \
> > +					     DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM  | \
> > +					     DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM   | \
> > +					     DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM))
> >
> >  struct fm10k_macvlan_filter_info {
> >  	uint16_t vlan_num;       /* Total VLAN number */
> > @@ -180,6 +185,7 @@ struct fm10k_rx_queue {
> >  	uint8_t drop_en;
> >  	uint8_t rx_deferred_start; /* don't start this queue in dev start. */
> >  	uint16_t rx_ftag_en; /* indicates FTAG RX supported */
> > +	uint64_t offloads; /* offloads of DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_* */
> >  };
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -212,6 +218,7 @@ struct fm10k_tx_queue {
> >  	uint16_t next_dd; /* Next pos to check DD flag */
> >  	volatile uint32_t *tail_ptr;
> >  	uint32_t txq_flags; /* Holds flags for this TXq */
> > +	uint64_t offloads; /* Offloads of DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_* */
> >  	uint16_t nb_desc;
> >  	uint16_t port_id;
> >  	uint8_t tx_deferred_start; /** don't start this queue in dev start.
> > */ diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> > index 9423761..5105874 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> > @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ fm10k_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >
> >  	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> >
> > -	if (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.hw_strip_crc == 0)
> > +	if (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP)
> >  		PMD_INIT_LOG(WARNING, "fm10k always strip CRC");
> >  	/* multipe queue mode checking */
> >  	ret  = fm10k_check_mq_mode(dev);
> > @@ -454,6 +454,8 @@ fm10k_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	dev->data->scattered_rx = 0;
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -756,7 +758,7 @@ fm10k_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >  		/* It adds dual VLAN length for supporting dual VLAN */
> >  		if ((dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len +
> >  				2 * FM10K_VLAN_TAG_SIZE) > buf_size ||
> > -			dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.enable_scatter) {
> > +			rxq->offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER) {
> >  			uint32_t reg;
> >  			dev->data->scattered_rx = 1;
> >  			reg = FM10K_READ_REG(hw, FM10K_SRRCTL(i)); @@
> > -1389,11 +1391,17 @@ fm10k_dev_infos_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  	dev_info->vmdq_queue_base    = 0;
> >  	dev_info->max_vmdq_pools     = ETH_32_POOLS;
> >  	dev_info->vmdq_queue_num     = FM10K_MAX_QUEUES_PF;
> > +	dev_info->rx_queue_offload_capa = DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER;
> >  	dev_info->rx_offload_capa =
> > -		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP |
> > -		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
> > -		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM  |
> > -		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
> > +		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP  |
> > +		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > +		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM  |
> > +		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM   |
> > +		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM   |
> > +		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME |
> > +		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP   |
> > +		DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER;
> > +	dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa = 0;
> >  	dev_info->tx_offload_capa =
> >  		DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT |
> >  		DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM  |
> > @@ -1412,6 +1420,7 @@ fm10k_dev_infos_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  		},
> >  		.rx_free_thresh = FM10K_RX_FREE_THRESH_DEFAULT(0),
> >  		.rx_drop_en = 0,
> > +		.offloads = 0,
> >  	};
> >
> >  	dev_info->default_txconf = (struct rte_eth_txconf) { @@ -1423,6
> > +1432,7 @@ fm10k_dev_infos_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  		.tx_free_thresh = FM10K_TX_FREE_THRESH_DEFAULT(0),
> >  		.tx_rs_thresh = FM10K_TX_RS_THRESH_DEFAULT(0),
> >  		.txq_flags = FM10K_SIMPLE_TX_FLAG,
> > +		.offloads = 0,
> >  	};
> >
> >  	dev_info->rx_desc_lim = (struct rte_eth_desc_lim) { @@ -1571,19
> > +1581,22 @@ static int  fm10k_vlan_offload_set(struct rte_eth_dev
> > +*dev,
> > int mask)  {
> >  	if (mask & ETH_VLAN_STRIP_MASK) {
> > -		if (!dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.hw_vlan_strip)
> > +		if (!(dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
> > +			DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP))
> >  			PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "VLAN stripping is "
> >  					"always on in fm10k");
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (mask & ETH_VLAN_EXTEND_MASK) {
> > -		if (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.hw_vlan_extend)
> > +		if (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
> > +			DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND)
> 
> Seems DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND is missed in fm10k_dev_infos_get?
> 
Yes, will add this offloading in my next version of patch.

> >  			PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "VLAN QinQ is not "
> >  					"supported in fm10k");
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (mask & ETH_VLAN_FILTER_MASK) {
> > -		if (!dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.hw_vlan_filter)
> > +		if (!(dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
> > +			DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER))
> >  			PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "VLAN filter is always on in fm10k");
> >  	}
> >
> > @@ -1879,6 +1892,7 @@ fm10k_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> > uint16_t queue_id,
> >  		fm10k_rxq_vec_setup(q);
> >
> >  	dev->data->rx_queues[queue_id] = q;
> > +	q->offloads = conf->offloads;
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1995,6 +2009,7 @@ fm10k_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> > uint16_t queue_id,
> >  	q->port_id = dev->data->port_id;
> >  	q->queue_id = queue_id;
> >  	q->txq_flags = conf->txq_flags;
> > +	q->offloads = conf->offloads;
> >  	q->ops = &def_txq_ops;
> >  	q->tail_ptr = (volatile uint32_t *)
> >  		&((uint32_t *)hw->hw_addr)[FM10K_TDT(queue_id)];
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> > b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> > index 498a178..e6dba04 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ fm10k_rx_vec_condition_check(struct
> rte_eth_dev
> > *dev)
> >
> >  #ifndef RTE_FM10K_RX_OLFLAGS_ENABLE
> >  	/* whithout rx ol_flags, no VP flag report */
> > -	if (rxmode->hw_vlan_extend != 0)
> > +	if (rxmode->offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND)
> >  		return -1;
> >  #endif
> >
> > @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ fm10k_rx_vec_condition_check(struct
> rte_eth_dev
> > *dev)
> >  		return -1;
> >
> >  	/* no header split support */
> > -	if (rxmode->header_split == 1)
> > +	if (rxmode->offloads & DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT)
> 
> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT also missed in fm10k_dev_infos_get?
Yes, will add this offloading in my next version of patch.
> >  		return -1;
> >
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ int __attribute__((cold))
> > fm10k_tx_vec_condition_check(struct fm10k_tx_queue *txq)  {
> >  	/* Vector TX can't offload any features yet */
> > -	if ((txq->txq_flags & FM10K_SIMPLE_TX_FLAG) !=
> > FM10K_SIMPLE_TX_FLAG)
> > +	if (txq->offloads & FM10K_SIMPLE_TX_OFFLOADS)
> >  		return -1;
> Is this correct? an offload not include in FM10K_SIMPLE_TX_OFFLOADS will
> also fail this branch and pass check, right?
> The logic can be implemented like below:
> 
> #define FM10K_VEC_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT  xxx | xxx ...
> 
> If (txq->offloads & FM10K_VEC_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT != txq->offload)
> 	return -1
> 
> Regards
> Qi
As there is a comment above show " Vector TX can't offload any features yet"
I'd like to use if (txq->offloads != 0) in my next version of patch.
> >
> >  	if (txq->tx_ftag_en)
> > --
> > 2.9.4