RE: [PATCH] smartpqi: initial submit of smartpqi man page

[Don Brace <don.brace-dzo6w/eZyo2tG0bUXCXiUA@public.gmane.org>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kerrisk (man-opages) [mailto:mtk.manpages@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:11 AM
> To: Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>; G. Branden Robinson
> <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
> Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com; linux-man@vger.kernel.org; Gerry Morong
> <gerry.morong@microsemi.com>; John Hall <John.Hall@microsemi.com>;
> Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@microsemi.com>; Bader Ali - Saleh
> <bader.alisaleh@microsemi.com>; Scott Teel <scott.teel@microsemi.com>;
> Justin Lindley <justin.lindley@microsemi.com>; Scott Benesh
> <scott.benesh@microsemi.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] smartpqi: initial submit of smartpqi man page
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
> 
> 
> Hello Don,
> 
> On 10/21/2017 12:10 AM, Don Brace wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: G. Branden Robinson [mailto:g.branden.robinson@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:36 PM
> >> To: Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>
> >> Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com; linux-man@vger.kernel.org; Gerry Morong
> >> <gerry.morong@microsemi.com>; John Hall <John.Hall@microsemi.com>;
> >> Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@microsemi.com>; Bader Ali - Saleh
> >> <bader.alisaleh@microsemi.com>; Scott Teel <scott.teel@microsemi.com>;
> >> Justin Lindley <justin.lindley@microsemi.com>; Scott Benesh
> >> <scott.benesh@microsemi.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] smartpqi: initial submit of smartpqi man page
> >>
> >> At 2017-10-18T10:10:39-0500, Don Brace wrote:
> >>> This patch contains the initial submission of the
> >>> smartpqi man page.
> >>
> >> Hi Don,
> >>
> >> Please find attached my recommended changes.
> >>
> >> I made many changes, most of them formatting-related.
> >
> > Really appreciate your effort!
> 
> My apologies for not weighing in sooner. I see you got a lot of input
> from Branden! (Thanks, Branden!) How shall we move forward? Possibilities:
> 
> 1. I apply your original patch as is.
> 2. You rework your patch incorporating those changes from Branden
>     that seem uncontroversial to you, and I apply, and then we
>     discuss any further changes that may be needed.
> 3. If all changes from Branden seem uncontroversial, I apply\
>     your patch, his patch, and then we  discuss any further changes
>     that may be needed.
> 
> I suspect 2 or 3 is the way to go, but I await your input.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael

I like option #3.