From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:58:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <499407E5.1070705__30788.0425746136$1234438249$gmane$org@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090212014503.GD30043@wotan.suse.de>
Nick Piggin wrote:
>> Actually, that's not the root cause here. You seem to have CONFIG_SMP
>> disabled but CONFIG_NUMA enabled. That's not possible on x86 which
>> makes me think it's a ppc kconfig bug. Hmm?
>>
>
> If it is really a valid config, then we should be able to make
> slqb build with it...
I am not sure if this is a valid config. According to arch/powerpc/Kconfig
NUMA depends on PPC64 and defaults to y if SMP & PPC_PSERIES is set.
If this is not a valid config then may be the make randconfig rules
need to be changed accordingly.
Ben should know. Ben ??
Thanks
-Sachin
--
---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-12 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 8:41 linux-next: Tree for February 10 Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-10 9:23 ` next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 9:54 ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 11:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-10 11:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-12 1:45 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12 1:45 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12 1:47 ` David Miller
2009-02-12 1:47 ` David Miller
2009-02-12 11:28 ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-12 11:28 ` Sachin P. Sant [this message]
2009-02-12 11:28 ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-12 11:28 ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-12 11:28 ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 10:30 ` Next Feb 10 : build/break arch/s390kernel.irq.o Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 11:15 ` [Patch] [s390] Fix init irq proc build break Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 11:40 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-02-10 10:45 ` Next Feb 10 build break on s390 : mm/shmem.c Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 13:40 ` Mimi Zohar
2009-02-10 19:55 ` linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima) Randy Dunlap
2009-02-10 22:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-11 0:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2009-02-12 17:54 ` [PATCH -next] security/audit/ima: fix build error Randy Dunlap
2009-02-12 18:24 ` Mimi Zohar
2009-02-12 18:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-02-12 22:31 ` James Morris
2009-02-11 1:29 ` linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima) Al Viro
2009-02-11 2:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='499407E5.1070705__30788.0425746136$1234438249$gmane$org@in.ibm.com' \
--to=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.