From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756049AbZBXMKs (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:10:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752457AbZBXMKi (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:10:38 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:44893 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751879AbZBXMKh (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:10:37 -0500 Message-ID: <49A3E38F.7080306@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:09:51 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Shanahan CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , Mike Galbraith , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected) References: <1235437183.4988.2.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au> In-Reply-To: <1235437183.4988.2.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kevin Shanahan wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> > > Yes, the problem should still be listed. > The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef. > Did tracing turn anything up? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:09:51 +0200 Message-ID: <49A3E38F.7080306@redhat.com> References: <1235437183.4988.2.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1235437183.4988.2.camel-9TBizaOOD0ujuAshGpSIhRCuuivNXqWP@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Kevin Shanahan Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , Mike Galbraith , Peter Zijlstra Kevin Shanahan wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should >> be listed and let me know (either way). >> > > Yes, the problem should still be listed. > The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef. > Did tracing turn anything up? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function