From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Detlef Vollmann <dv@vollmann.ch>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:46:43 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] at91: change CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000
In-Reply-To: <20090403132127.GE14955@game.jcrosoft.org>
References: <1235527085-23900-1-git-send-email-dv@vollmann.ch>
	<49D50DDC.2000001@free.fr>
	<20090402190616.GJ2651@game.jcrosoft.org>
	<49D60BED.3080009@vollmann.ch> <49D60D0D.8000209@free.fr>
	<20090403132127.GE14955@game.jcrosoft.org>
Message-ID: <49D62153.4090505@vollmann.ch>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 15:20 Fri 03 Apr     , Eric BENARD wrote:
>> Detlef Vollmann a ?crit :
>>> Where can I find that patch?
>>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/56837
Thanks.

>> Is it interesting to loose time calculating PLL values at each boot when
>> these value can be defined in the board config file ?
> yes because you will not loose that much 1ms in the worse case
> but you will be sure about it evenif you change it in the at91bootstrap change
> or the lowlevel_init. It's safer
I probably agree.  (Well, not completely, as I'd like to get rid
of at91bootstrap completely and let U-Boot be the original boot
code, but that's future.)

Unfortunately that clock patch doesn't solve the timer issue, and
makes it even worse...
And I agree that it's not very useful to apply my old patch against 
that.  The point is that I don't know against which git repository
I should create any new patch.
I'd prefer to use git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git, but I'm willing to
use git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91.git, but neither of those contain
the clock patch yet...

Best Regards,
   Detlef