From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LqpJN-00041A-9W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:56:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LqpJI-00040Z-Dd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:56:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43997 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LqpJI-00040W-9y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:56:24 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:26245) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LqpJH-0001kc-So for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:56:24 -0400 Message-ID: <49DA09FE.9070009@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:56:14 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] xen: pv domain support. References: <1238621982-18333-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1238706878.5426.1.camel@Quad> <49D6708D.4000601@redhat.com> <88ADCEFD-E057-4264-8447-9E53A661B35D@suse.de> <49D87044.3030406@redhat.com> <803692EA-B562-4D41-A809-7EF552180B8F@suse.de> <49D8980D.1070000@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <49D8980D.1070000@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Laurent Vivier , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Gerd Hoffmann , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel Avi Kivity wrote: >>> 2) Alternative to HVM. That's how this came up from Gerd's mail. We do >> have KVM support in upstream qemu, but we don't have Xen HVM support. >> That way you could use the same binary for all your needs. Admittedly, >> it might make more sense to just implement HVM support :-). > > I was under the impression that this is underway. > We certainly want to do it, we just haven't got the time yet. After Gerd's patches get accepted I think it won't take too long to create a similar patchqueue for hvm, the two tree are getting closer and closer every month. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] xen: pv domain support. Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:56:14 +0100 Message-ID: <49DA09FE.9070009@eu.citrix.com> References: <1238621982-18333-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1238706878.5426.1.camel@Quad> <49D6708D.4000601@redhat.com> <88ADCEFD-E057-4264-8447-9E53A661B35D@suse.de> <49D87044.3030406@redhat.com> <803692EA-B562-4D41-A809-7EF552180B8F@suse.de> <49D8980D.1070000@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49D8980D.1070000@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Avi Kivity Cc: Laurent Vivier , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Gerd Hoffmann , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Avi Kivity wrote: >>> 2) Alternative to HVM. That's how this came up from Gerd's mail. We do >> have KVM support in upstream qemu, but we don't have Xen HVM support. >> That way you could use the same binary for all your needs. Admittedly, >> it might make more sense to just implement HVM support :-). > > I was under the impression that this is underway. > We certainly want to do it, we just haven't got the time yet. After Gerd's patches get accepted I think it won't take too long to create a similar patchqueue for hvm, the two tree are getting closer and closer every month.