From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B407FDDFB0 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:02:00 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <49EF939B.50002@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:00:59 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: removing get_immrbase()?? References: <49EF7B11.2000006@freescale.com> <49EF7B1C.2080105@freescale.com> <282847E1-AE1A-44EF-9D18-AF2884105FA5@kernel.crashing.org> <49EF8D42.7010104@freescale.com> <49EF9019.7000102@freescale.com> <49EF938C.9050704@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <49EF938C.9050704@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Linuxppc-dev Development List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Scott Wood wrote: > That is indeed the case. A "demonstration" of that for the tree you > quote is that the "reg" address changed -- if you tried feeding the old > tree into the new kernel, it would not find the CPM command register. > There is no code in the kernel that looks for the command-proc property > anymore. In that case, I have no issues. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale