All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] BUG on xnintr_attach
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:20:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F016B2.8040709@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49EF4A6A.4010604@domain.hid>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2697 bytes --]

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 14:26 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> issuing  rtdm_irq_request and, thus, xnintr_attach can trigger a
>>> "I-pipe: Detected stalled topmost domain, probably caused by a bug." if
>>> the interrupt type is MSI:
>>>
>>>   [<ffffffff80273cce>] ipipe_check_context+0xe7/0xe9
>>>   [<ffffffff8049dae9>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x18/0x54
>>>   [<ffffffff8037dcc2>] pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x3c/0x87
>>>   [<ffffffff80387c1d>] read_msi_msg+0x61/0xe1
>>>   [<ffffffff8021c5b8>] ? assign_irq_vector+0x3e/0x49
>>>   [<ffffffff8021d7b2>] set_msi_irq_affinity+0x6d/0xc8
>>>   [<ffffffff8021fa5d>] __ipipe_set_irq_affinity+0x6c/0x77
>>>   [<ffffffff80274231>] ipipe_set_irq_affinity+0x34/0x3d
>>>   [<ffffffff8027c572>] xnintr_attach+0xaa/0x11e
>>>
>>> Two option to fix this, but I'm currently undecided which one to go:
>>>  - harden pci_lock (drivers/pci/access.c) - didn't we applied such a
>>>    MSI-related workaround before?
>> This did not work as expected: pathological latency spots. This said,
>> the vanilla code has evolved since I tried this quick hack months ago,
>> so it may be worth to look at this option once again.
>>
>>>  - move xnarch_set_irq_affinity out of intrlock (but couldn't we face
>>>    even more pci_lock related issues?)
>>>
>> Since upstream decided to use PCI config reads even inside hot paths
>> when processing MSI interrupts, the only sane way would be to make the
>> locking used there Adeos-aware, likely virtualizing the interrupt mask.
>> The way upstream generally deals with MSI is currently a problem for us.
> 
> Hmm, guess this needs a closer look again. But I vaguely recall upstream
> had removed the config reading at least from the hot paths due to
> complaints about performance.

I went through the critical MSI code paths again. Its irqchip comes with
ack, mask/unmask and set_affinity which may be used by Xenomai. The ack
is most important as it runs during early dispatching, but it maps to
ack_apic_edge, thus is clean. The rest is contaminated with PCI config
access.

At least pci_lock is involved for this, depending on the PCI access
method, also pci_config_lock. And then there are other code paths that
call wake_up_all while holding pci_lock. This locks more or less hopeless.

On the other hand, we shouldn't depend on mask/unmask or set_affinity
while in critical Xenomai/I-pipe code paths. The MSI interrupt flow is
the same as for edge-triggered (except that there is even no EIO). That
means we do not mask deferred interrupts. And that means we should be
safe once the affinity setting is fixed.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-22 12:26 [Xenomai-core] BUG on xnintr_attach Jan Kiszka
2009-04-22 16:23 ` Philippe Gerum
2009-04-22 16:48   ` Jan Kiszka
2009-04-23  7:20     ` Jan Kiszka [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49F016B2.8040709@domain.hid \
    --to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.