From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Rybchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ethdev: add a function to look up Rx offload names Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:52:30 +0300 Message-ID: <49b1556b-b1ec-2264-1450-1887c3290c4f@solarflare.com> References: <1515658359-1041-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> <1515658359-1041-2-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> <1871861.OTzHAPg5Oj@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: , Ferruh Yigit , Shahaf Shuler To: Thomas Monjalon , Ivan Malov Return-path: Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [67.231.154.164]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5DC1B16F for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:52:43 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 01/18/2018 10:16 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > On 01/17/2018 08:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> Hi, 2 comments below >> >> 11/01/2018 09:12, Andrew Rybchenko: >>> From: Ivan Malov >>> >>> +#define    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(_name)    \ >>> +    { DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_##_name, #_name } >>> + >>> +static const struct { >>> +    uint64_t offload; >>> +    const char *name; >>> +} rte_rx_offload_names[] = { >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_STRIP), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(IPV4_CKSUM), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(UDP_CKSUM), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(TCP_CKSUM), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(TCP_LRO), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(QINQ_STRIP), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(MACSEC_STRIP), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(HEADER_SPLIT), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_FILTER), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(VLAN_EXTEND), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(JUMBO_FRAME), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(CRC_STRIP), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(SCATTER), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(TIMESTAMP), >>> +    RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR(SECURITY), >>> +}; >>> + >>> +#undef RTE_RX_OFFLOAD_BIT2STR >> Why this undef? > > It is a constant-local macro with assumption to be used as I mean context-local, sorry. > initializer of the corresponding structure. So, under is just to > limit its context and be sure that it is will not clash or be reused > most likely in a wrong way.