From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M3nDK-0007fp-5T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 04:19:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M3nDE-0007es-VL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 04:19:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52938 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M3nDE-0007ek-Nu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 04:19:44 -0400 Received: from lizzard.sbs.de ([194.138.37.39]:24195) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M3nDD-0005YF-LV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 04:19:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4A093118.2060000@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:19:36 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC] Use hxtool to generate monitor documentation and C structures List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel Blue Swirl wrote: > Hi, > > The benefit from using a common file is not so great as with > qemu-options. Comments? Without looking at too much details: approach is reasonable - and reminds me that I just recently submitted a new command without updating the doc... Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux