All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Fischer, Anna" <anna.fischer@hp.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Network I/O performance
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:23:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0A7556.4070406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0199E0D51A61344794750DC57738F58E66BBF927A9@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>

Fischer, Anna wrote:
> I am running KVM with Fedora Core 8 on a 2.6.23 32-bit kernel. I use the tun/tap device model and the Linux bridge kernel module to connect my VM to the network. I have 2 10G Intel 82598 network devices (with the ixgbe driver) attached to my machine and I want to do packet routing in my VM (the VM has two virtual network interfaces configured). Analysing the network performance of the standard QEMU emulated NICs, I get less that 1G of throughput on those 10G links. Surprisingly though, I don't really see CPU utilization being maxed out. This is a dual core machine, and mpstat shows me that both CPUs are about 40% idle. My VM is more or less unresponsive due to the high network processing load while the host OS still seems to be in good shape. How can I best tune this setup to achieve bes
 t possible performance with KVM? I know there is virtIO and I know there is PCI pass-through, but those models are not an option for me right now.
>   

How many cpus are assigned to the guest?  If only one, then 40% idle 
equates to 100% of a core for the guest and 20% for housekeeping.

If this is the case, you could try pinning the vcpu thread ("info cpus" 
from the monitor) to one core.  You should then see 100%/20% cpu load 
distribution.

wrt emulated NIC performance, I'm guessing you're not doing tcp?  If you 
were we might do something with TSO.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-13  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-12  0:28 Network I/O performance Fischer, Anna
2009-05-13  7:23 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-05-13 15:56   ` Fischer, Anna
2009-05-17 21:14     ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-19  1:30       ` Herbert Xu
2009-05-19  4:53         ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-19  7:18       ` tun/tap and Vlans (was: Re: Network I/O performance) Lukas Kolbe
2009-05-19  7:45         ` tun/tap and Vlans Avi Kivity
2009-05-19 19:46           ` Lukas Kolbe
2009-05-20 10:25           ` Fischer, Anna
2009-05-20 10:38             ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-19 21:22       ` Does KVM suffer from ACK-compression as you increase the number of VMs? Andrew de Andrade
2009-05-20 10:15       ` Network I/O performance Fischer, Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A0A7556.4070406@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=anna.fischer@hp.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.