From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755278AbZEYXEb (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 19:04:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754820AbZEYXEW (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 19:04:22 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:36374 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754618AbZEYXEW (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 19:04:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4A1B23AB.7090204@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:03:07 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Tejun Heo , Venkatesh Pallipadi , Zhang Rui , Suresh Siddha Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes for 2.6.30-rc8 References: <200905252003.n4PK3sFi014919@voreg.hos.anvin.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Now you made it do two different "on_each_cpu" things. Maybe it doesn't >> matter, but it just seems wrong. > > Btw, I pulled, I just wanted to note that I don't think this was done > optimally/cleanly. > Understood. Do you want a fix now or for .31? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.