From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757584AbZEZWky (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 18:40:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757064AbZEZWko (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 18:40:44 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com ([209.85.218.222]:47829 "EHLO mail-bw0-f222.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756459AbZEZWkn (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 18:40:43 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=mn6c6b8QmWsh5cy/Rl3MZofopsdcUT8OcRsKunzVQy4FlMXR4n0yUEBP0BfmiCvbJR 42DE+ZjJ2U89rCUBoMzxajQ6vTTmGUF87KvVD8Gn02QcwiWwTsSmURDY3ltwzeGdTsF5 W3Yq9UC2H09Ag7QmMJxW6g7HXG7T9Bn91ugqI= Message-ID: <4A1C6FE9.1050003@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:40:41 +0200 From: Michael Riepe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: mb@bu3sch.de, dave@thedillows.org, romieu@fr.zoreil.com, rsantos@grupopie.com, m.bueker@berlin.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts References: <20090525.225503.173348268.davem@davemloft.net> <200905262022.24593.mb@bu3sch.de> <20090526.145211.37114439.davem@davemloft.net> <20090526.151410.109935435.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20090526.151410.109935435.davem@davemloft.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller > Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:52:11 -0700 (PDT) > > >>From: Michael Buesch >>Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:22:23 +0200 >> >> >>>I didn't notice a CC:stable. >>>I think this should also go to stable. >>>Does somebody take care? >> >>I'll queue it up. > > > Actually, this patch doesn't even remotely come close to applying > to 2.6.29.4 Michael Buesch already provided a patch against 2.6.29.4 that we both tested. I doubt that it will apply to 2.6.27 cleanly, though. -- Michael "Tired" Riepe X-Tired: Each morning I get up I die a little