From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761802AbZFMR6R (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:58:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752636AbZFMR6F (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:58:05 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:33920 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751264AbZFMR6D (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:58:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4A33E892.6010704@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:57:38 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Frysinger CC: Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: hard_irqs: handle NR_IRQS > 256 automatically References: <1244903447-23579-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1244903447-23579-2-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1244903447-23579-2-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mike Frysinger wrote: > If we're going to automatically set HARDIRQ_BITS for the arch, might as > well be a little bit smart about it and set it to 9 automatically if > NR_IRQS is larger than 8 bits. > Why would the only possible values be 8 or 9? > > #ifndef HARDIRQ_BITS > -#define HARDIRQ_BITS 8 > +# if NR_IRQS > 256 > +# define HARDIRQ_BITS 9 > +# else > +# define HARDIRQ_BITS 8 > +# endif > #endif > > /* -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.