From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Configuration vs. compat hints [was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 03/13] qemu: add routines to manage PCI capabilities] Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:56:24 +0300 Message-ID: <4A375E38.7020502@redhat.com> References: <1244821292.30522.56.camel@blaa> <4A364B53.9080007@codemonkey.ws> <4A364FE0.40204@redhat.com> <4A3651EB.3070204@codemonkey.ws> <4A36555A.4090303@redhat.com> <4A3659A0.3050108@codemonkey.ws> <4A366348.1030202@redhat.com> <1245083229.3222.103.camel@blaa> <4A368F12.2090504@codemonkey.ws> <4A36912A.8090900@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , Mark McLoughlin , dlaor@redhat.com, Carsten Otte , Rusty Russell , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Glauber Costa , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Christian Borntraeger , Paul Brook To: Blue Swirl Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:42078 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998AbZFPI6y (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:58:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/15/2009 09:44 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> pc-qemu-0.10? >> > > pc-2009.06? Or given the hardware, should that be pc-1997? > pc-qemu-0.10 has the obvious benefit of allowing people to immediately know what's the oldest version of qemu that supports it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGUVR-00075u-Bz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:59:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGUVL-0006xO-GY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:59:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46825 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGUVL-0006wu-8a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:58:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:50865) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGUVJ-0002nr-S3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:58:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4A375E38.7020502@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:56:24 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Configuration vs. compat hints [was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3 03/13] qemu: add routines to manage PCI capabilities] References: <1244821292.30522.56.camel@blaa> <4A364B53.9080007@codemonkey.ws> <4A364FE0.40204@redhat.com> <4A3651EB.3070204@codemonkey.ws> <4A36555A.4090303@redhat.com> <4A3659A0.3050108@codemonkey.ws> <4A366348.1030202@redhat.com> <1245083229.3222.103.camel@blaa> <4A368F12.2090504@codemonkey.ws> <4A36912A.8090900@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: Mark McLoughlin , dlaor@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Carsten Otte , Glauber Costa , Rusty Russell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Christian Borntraeger , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paul Brook On 06/15/2009 09:44 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> pc-qemu-0.10? >> > > pc-2009.06? Or given the hardware, should that be pc-1997? > pc-qemu-0.10 has the obvious benefit of allowing people to immediately know what's the oldest version of qemu that supports it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function