From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peter@programming.kicks-ass.net>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mmu_notifiers: turn off lockdep around mm_take_all_locks
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:18:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A53917C.6080208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246990505.5197.2.camel@laptop>
On 07/07/2009 09:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 15:06 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>> KVM guests with CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y trigger the following warning:
>>
>> BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
>> turning off the locking correctness validator.
>> Pid: 4624, comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 2.6.31-rc2-03981-g3abaf21
>> #32
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff81068bab>] __lock_acquire+0x1559/0x15fc
>> [<ffffffff810be4d9>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0x99/0x109
>> [<ffffffff810be4d9>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0x99/0x109
>> [<ffffffff81068d3c>] lock_acquire+0xee/0x112
>> [<ffffffff810be516>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0xd6/0x109
>> [<ffffffff81402596>] ? _spin_lock_nest_lock+0x20/0x50
>> [<ffffffff814025b7>] _spin_lock_nest_lock+0x41/0x50
>> [<ffffffff810be516>] ? mm_take_all_locks+0xd6/0x109
>> [<ffffffff810be516>] mm_take_all_locks+0xd6/0x109
>> [<ffffffff810d0f76>] do_mmu_notifier_register+0xd4/0x199
>> [<ffffffff810d1060>] mmu_notifier_register+0x13/0x15
>> [<ffffffffa0107f16>] kvm_dev_ioctl+0x13f/0x30e [kvm]
>> [<ffffffff810e6a3a>] vfs_ioctl+0x2f/0x7d
>> [<ffffffff810e6fb7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4af/0x4ec
>> [<ffffffff814030b4>] ? error_exit+0x94/0xb0
>> [<ffffffff81401f92>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x3c
>> [<ffffffff8100bc2d>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
>> [<ffffffff810e703b>] sys_ioctl+0x47/0x6a
>> [<ffffffff811d849c>] ? __up_read+0x1a/0x85
>> [<ffffffff8100b1db>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>
>> Since mm_take_all_locks takes a gazillion locks.
>>
>> Is there any way around this other than completly shutting down lockdep?
>>
>
> When we created this the promise was that kvm would only do this on a
> fresh mm with only a few vmas, has that changed
The number of vmas did increase, but not materially. We do link with
more shared libraries though.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-07 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 18:06 mmu_notifiers: turn off lockdep around mm_take_all_locks Marcelo Tosatti
2009-07-07 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-07 18:18 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-07-07 18:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-07-07 19:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-07 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-07 20:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-07 23:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A53917C.6080208@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peter@programming.kicks-ass.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.