From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:06:47 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] I2C Add initial support for TWL4030 In-Reply-To: <4A633A57.9060002@denx.de> References: <1244638432-30893-1-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com> <1244638432-30893-2-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com> <1244638432-30893-3-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com> <20090719091944.4B70C832E416@gemini.denx.de> <4A633A57.9060002@denx.de> Message-ID: <4A6352A7.7080307@windriver.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Omap2 is still pending. I was hoping to help Richard out with this last week but he was on travel. There is not much more I think I can do wrt omap2. All my targets are omap3. The nearest I can find online is the nokia n8xx which uses a another bootloader. The options as I see them are. 1. Get a pass on omap2 testing 2. Rewrite i2c init to have a omap3 specific init 3. Hack n8xx and try to convience you the results are reasonable 4. Wait for omap2 testing. I vote for #1. Tom Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Wolfgang, > > Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> In message <1244638432-30893-3-git-send-email-Tom.Rix@windriver.com> Tom Rix wrote: >> >>> The TWL4030 supplies many peripheral for OMAP3 boards. These include >>> power management, usb and, keyboard. >>> >>> The product description is found here: >>> >>> http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tps65950.html >>> >>> Product reference document, tps65950.pdf, is found here: >>> >>> http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/tps65950 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix >>> --- >>> drivers/i2c/Makefile | 1 + >>> drivers/i2c/twl4030_i2c.c | 37 ++++++++ >>> include/twl4030.h | 221 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/twl4030_i2c.c >>> create mode 100644 include/twl4030.h >>> >> I think this is supposed to go through the i2c repo, but I haven't >> seen any comments yet. >> > > > Hmm.. there are responses, see for example: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054086.html > > >> Can you please check the state of this patch? Thanks in advance. >> > > Hmm.. it is a little long to follow this ... it ended > first here: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054654.html > > waiting for an Ack that it works on omap2 ... > > (I Acked the resulting 3 patches, see: > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054585.html > ) > > Ah, found one more answer from Tom: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/054801.html > > ended in: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055071.html > > with a new patchset of 6 patches, starting with: > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055072.html > > but state of omap2 is still pending ... see: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-June/055087.html > > then Tom wrote, he has setup a git repo, see: > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055328.html > > but I think, the state of the omap2 is pending ... so > I (and I think Jean-Christophe also) wait for, that this > pending state is going away ... > > Tom, do you have an update? > > (added Jean-Christophe to cc:) > bye > Heiko >