From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Pratt Subject: Re: Updated performance results Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:05:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4A69CDD4.6060302@austin.ibm.com> References: <4A68AD69.4030803@dangyankee.net> <20090723210051.GB1040@think> <4A68DE81.3020505@dangyankee.net> <20090724132407.GC16192@think> <20090724140002.GD16192@think> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed To: Chris Mason , linux-btrfs Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090724140002.GD16192@think> List-ID: Chris Mason wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:24:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > >>>> >>>> >>> Sure, will try to get to it tomorrow. >>> >> Sorry, I missed a fix in the experimental branch. I'll push out a >> rebased version in a few minutes. >> >> > > Ok, the rebased version is ready to use. > Ok, good. Also seems I misspoke on the -o ssd results. I looked them over again this morning and they are slightly bette than without. Initial score of 46MB/sec vs 44MB/sec without, and degrades after 30 minutes to about 25MB/sec vs 20MB/sec without. So after 30 minutes of runtime -o ssd is running about 25% faster, but still significant degrade. Steve > -chris > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >