From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Kuvyrkov Subject: Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1 Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:50:59 +0400 Message-ID: <4A9F9183.2040403@codesourcery.com> References: <8259f0250908302028n9b0cb56td402539007736fce@mail.gmail.com> <20090831120617.GA1114@marenka.net> <8259f0250908310558l3ddd5fam7d15946a7c1e8572@mail.gmail.com> <8259f0250908311511h77270544vb2dc3dd383f1add8@mail.gmail.com> <8259f0250908311516r49e54c7fi44ead0f040cade30@mail.gmail.com> <20090901151747.GB27514@marenka.net> <8259f0250909021816g2b6a37dfs9bd91c4cabaf457a@mail.gmail.com> <8259f0250909021822k70b1a152sce6ecc651334800@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:52941 "EHLO mail.codesourcery.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754841AbZICJvJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 05:51:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8259f0250909021822k70b1a152sce6ecc651334800@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: mike Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org mike wrote: > I tried to boot 2.6.29 or whatever... It was so slow compared to 2.4 i > donno what to say, except its crap. Not a surprise if gcc produces > crappier and crappier 68k binaries anyway. Would you mind submitting a bug report or two with preprocessed testcases showing examples of bad code generation on m68k, especially if the code has regressed since some previous version of GCC? Please CC me on the bug reports. Thanks, -- Maxim K. CodeSourcery