From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: UDP regression with packets rates < 10k per sec Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:37:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4AA963A4.5080509@gmail.com> References: <4AA6E039.4000907@gmail.com> <4AA7C512.6040100@gmail.com> <4AA7E082.90807@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:52454 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752605AbZIJUh5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:37:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Something must be wrong with program or whatever... On the receiver I did this to trace the latency messages only # tcpdump -i eth0 not host 239.0.192.2 and port 9002 -n 22:28:07.223300 IP 55.225.18.7.9002 > 55.225.18.5.9002: UDP, length 32 22:28:07.223403 IP 55.225.18.5.9002 > 55.225.18.7.9002: UDP, length 32 22:28:08.223301 IP 55.225.18.7.9002 > 55.225.18.5.9002: UDP, length 32 22:28:08.223416 IP 55.225.18.5.9002 > 55.225.18.7.9002: UDP, length 32 22:28:09.223380 IP 55.225.18.7.9002 > 55.225.18.5.9002: UDP, length 32 22:28:09.223494 IP 55.225.18.5.9002 > 55.225.18.7.9002: UDP, length 32 22:28:10.223481 IP 55.225.18.7.9002 > 55.225.18.5.9002: UDP, length 32 22:28:10.223597 IP 55.225.18.5.9002 > 55.225.18.7.9002: UDP, length 32 22:28:11.223581 IP 55.225.18.7.9002 > 55.225.18.5.9002: UDP, length 32 22:28:11.223678 IP 55.225.18.5.9002 > 55.225.18.7.9002: UDP, length 32 See how the answer is *very* slow ? Something like > 100 us ?