From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755186AbZINVew (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:34:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752789AbZINVet (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:34:49 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]:50268 "EHLO mail-fx0-f217.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752090AbZINVes (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:34:48 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=QKckk3i1rGYDBdI7ZLx+nlTgzBUdP/JZSkq+S+l99ld3y3qWxSJ4lfaJ2Sgi0Q8A6d nLhLoMdRiSXWiVgh9CG25WYvDnqSj6z/6aCB7gPj7lGsrYeJG3ipwVj76dHVZyB+1IU5 iOMQIyAOmqQFtJPN87QUTQk0QuITgcoe3sbdo= Message-ID: <4AAEB6F0.4080706@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:34:40 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; cs-CZ; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 SUSE/3.0b3-8.6 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Mohr CC: Guennadi Liakhovetski , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Luca Risolia , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: V4L2 drivers: potentially dangerous and inefficient msecs_to_jiffies() calculation References: <20090914210741.GA16799@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> In-Reply-To: <20090914210741.GA16799@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.97a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/14/2009 11:07 PM, Andreas Mohr wrote: > ./drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c > do > cam->module_param.frame_timeout * > 1000 * msecs_to_jiffies(1) ); > multiple times each. > What they should do instead is > frame_timeout * msecs_to_jiffies(1000), I'd think. In fact, msecs_to_jiffies(frame_timeout * 1000) makes much more sense. > msecs_to_jiffies(1) is quite a bit too boldly assuming > that all of the msecs_to_jiffies(x) implementation branches > always round up. They do, don't they?