From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sharyathi Nagesh Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 61s! , while running cpu controller latency testcase on two containers parallaly Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:42:03 +0530 Message-ID: <4AAFA0B3.4050805@in.ibm.com> References: <4AA8C7E2.1080002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090911112504.GI4474@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090911112504.GI4474@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dhaval Giani Cc: Rishikesh , containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iranna.ankad@in.ibm.com, bharanga@in.ibm.com, sharyath@linux.vnet.ibm.com, risrajak@in.ibm.com, bharata.rao@in.ibm.com, mbeeraka@in.ibm.com, svishuku@in.ibm.com, santwana.samantray@in.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org The same problem was observed while testing with 2.6.29 kernel, this is what I could gather from looking into the error message, Dhaval Giani wrote: > [Adding the scheduler maintainers to the cc] > >> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 61s! [cpuctl_latency_:17174] >> Modules linked in: bridge stp llc bnep sco l2cap bluetooth sunrpc ipv6 >> p4_clockmod dm_multipath uinput qla2xxx ata_generic pata_acpi >> usb_storage e1000 scsi_transport_fc joydev scsi_tgt i2c_piix4 >> pata_serverworks pcspkr serio_raw mptspi mptscsih mptbase >> scsi_transport_spi radeon ttm drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: >> scsi_wait_scan] >> >> Pid: 17174, comm: cpuctl_latency_ Tainted: G W (2.6.31-rc7 #1) >> IBM eServer BladeCenter HS40 -[883961X]- >> EIP: 0060:[] EFLAGS: 00000283 CPU: 3 >> EIP is at find_next_bit+0x9/0x79 >> EAX: c2c437a0 EBX: f3d433c0 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000020 >> ESI: c2c436bc EDI: 00000000 EBP: f063be6c ESP: f063be64 >> DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 >> CR0: 80050033 CR2: 008765a4 CR3: 314d7000 CR4: 000006d0 >> DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 >> DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 >> Call Trace: >> [] cpumask_next+0x17/0x19 EIP matches to 'tg_shares_up+0xd9/0x149', ----------------------- This maps to address location 5c37 in the objdump /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.29/linux-2.6.29.i686/kernel/sched.c:1511 if (abs(shares - tg->se[cpu]->load.weight) > 5c33: 89 d0 mov %edx,%eax 5c35: 2b 01 sub (%ecx),%eax 5c37: 89 c1 mov %eax,%ecx 5c39: c1 f9 1f sar $0x1f,%ecx 5c3c: 31 c8 xor %ecx,%eax 5c3e: 29 c8 sub %ecx,%eax 5c40: 3b 05 00 00 00 00 cmp 0x0,%eax 5c46: 76 3d jbe 5c85 /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.29/linux-2.6.29.i686/kernel/sched.c:1516 sysctl_sched_shares_thresh) { struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu); ----------------------- This matches to line 1511 - 1516 in the kernel code 1511 if (abs(shares - tg->se[cpu]->load.weight) > 1512 sysctl_sched_shares_thresh) { 1513 struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu); 1514 unsigned long flags; 1515 1516 spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags); ----------------------- I suspect this soft lock ups are due to rq->lock contention. Thanks Sharyathi